Done Deal: Completes Network Solutions Acquisition put out a press release this evening announcing that the deal to acquire Network Solutions has been approved and finalized. The deal, valued at approximately $576 million ($405 million in cash and 18 million shares of common stock), was originally announced in August, and it comes on the heels of’s acquisiton of in June of 2010.

This acquisition triples’s customer base, and it will allow the company to offer cross-sells and up-sells to customers. In total, there are now about 3 million “subscribers.”  According to David Brown, chairman and chief executive officer of “This transaction more than doubles our revenue, triples the size of our customer base, and provides the expanded scale to invest greater resources in growth and branding initiatives.”

I am interested in learning more about the branding initiatives that were mentioned by Brown. and Network Solutions have built solid brand names over the last 15+ years, and they have arguably more consumer recognition than

Do you think the company should re-brand under one unified name, or do you think it makes more sense to operate under different identities?

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn


  1. Considering the brand awareness operating under different brands will be a better decision.
    Otherwise re-branding all the companies under one name called will be much far better option.

  2. Traditionally does not re-brand. We all live under the umbrella of Web but mantain our Indentities. If you go to you can see the many companies in the family. It works very well actuallly. We pull from each others strenghts.

  3. I’m all for a slow brand re-alignment. Keep as is at the moment and change from within first.

    Then, when ready, re-brand.

    Otherwise you’ll end up losing people scared of the big big corporate giant trampling all over them!

  4. Thanks Mr. Silver, but in “the” internet-era nobody cares about “the”. Internet is too popular and not anymore specific.(“part of me, you, etc)
    Sorry I interrupted the comments flow..

  5. Hi Elliot,

    As you know I keep hand registering domains daily, even tho most gems, one word category killers have been taken, there are still some non-category killers left.

    So, can you give me an appraisal on:

    (I know that is better, but it’s taken). I intend to develop this one myself.


  6. BTW Elliot,

    I just registered two mo domains, one is a branding, they are:

    I will develop both myself as well. They’re not for sale


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Poll: Are You Going to ICANN 79?

The ICANN 79 Community Forum Meeting is coming up in a couple of weeks. The meeting will be held in Puerto Rico from March...

Domain Broker’s Ad Campaign Highlighted by X Business with a Repost from Elon Musk

When looking at domain investor Twitter, I've noticed a few promoted/advertising tweets mentioning Rob Schutz and/or I recently wrote about Rob and his...

NameJet Announces Platform Enhancements

Last Summer, NameJet made some "big changes" to its platform. In essence, NameJet appears to have become a clone of Snapnames, its sister auction...

Rationale Behind Acquisition

It's not often that we hear from the founders of a company to discuss why they spent what they did to acquire a specific...

.Bet Domain Name Acquired for 5 Figures, Reportedly Resold for $600k

According to a tweet from Identity Digital (formerly Donuts), the domain name reportedly sold for $600,000. I have not verified or researched the...