CBA Highlights the Email Aspect of Domain Name Ownership

The Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) covered some news about an error that was caused by using an incorrect domain name in an email address. The error involved the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA). Here’s what happened, according to SMH:

“The bank on Friday said it had conducted an information security investigation, after it emerged that last financial year staff had inadvertently sent 651 internal emails to email addresses with the domain name, rather than the bank’s actual domain name of”

Incidentally, something very similar recently happened to a different bank in Australia when “customer information was sent in error to an address rather than an email address on the domain,” reported ZDNet in January of 2017.

A little less than a year ago, I wrote an article about how email is the domain name X factor. Many companies still don’t think domain names are super important. They may feel their money is better spent on branding or building products/services rather than buying an expensive exact match domain name. Companies that think this way may opt for a less expensive ccTLD or cutesy domain name like “GetX” or “UseX” instead of the exact match .com name. Clients, vendors, prospects, and apparently even internal marketing teams may be confused or forgetful and use the brand match .com domain name instead. If the email snafu involves private information or data being shared with unauthorized parties, that can be a big problem if the company doesn’t control that other domain name.

This is another example of why companies, especially those who retain private consumer data, should practically do whatever it takes to get the brand matching .com domain name for their business.

As you may recall, I wrote about the domain name a couple of years ago. The SMH article also discussed the acquisition of the domain name, but I found one aspect of the article to be a bit confusing:

“The bank said that in 2016-17, was owned by a United States cyber security company, and before that, it was owed by a US financial services company called Cheslock Bakker & Associates.”

A entry from May of 2016 shows that the domain name was parked with PPC advertising links in 2016. Using the Whois History tool at DomainTools, I was able to see the domain name was parked using Parking Crew name servers in 2016 (Parking Crew is a domain name parking / monetization company). Although the domain name was registered under privacy, I do not believe the registrant of the domain name was a cybersecurity firm as reported, but rather a domain investment company. I was able to confirm this with Mike Robertson, the person who acquired the domain name in the bankruptcy auction on behalf of his client.

I think the case of illustrates how problematic it can be for a big firm to not own the exact match .com domain name. I have heard many people downplay concerns about confusing domain names because they believe customers and prospects will find their website via Google or social networking tools. They also need to understand the role of email and how a confusing domain name can be problematic.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn


  1. Yes Andrea I just noticed that too.

    The SMH article states:

    “CBA bought the domain name in April last year to deal with the issue, and from January 2017 it started blocking any internal emails addressed to the domain”

    Typing redirects to which is the correct domain for the Commonwealth Bank, so they would appear to now own it. also redirects to and so does And so does

    ICANN whois says is regged at which is in turn regged at CSC Corporate Domains. And so is, so there is a common ownership link.

    So on NameJet, is in PreRelease with over 100 bidders, 16 days to go and a max bid of $32,001.

    The Commonwealth is Australia’s largest bank and makes an annual profit around USD 6 billion. There is no way they would be letting this domain go.

  2. .com is becoming more popular in Australia so it makes sense for companies to have both otherwise there will be confusion. The situation may get more extreme if auDA ever launches .au which will add a lot of customer confusion into the namespace.

  3. The pre-release auction of at NameJet was finally removed today. Strange that it was there in the first place.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Poll: Are You Going to ICANN 79?

The ICANN 79 Community Forum Meeting is coming up in a couple of weeks. The meeting will be held in Puerto Rico from March...

Domain Broker’s Ad Campaign Highlighted by X Business with a Repost from Elon Musk

When looking at domain investor Twitter, I've noticed a few promoted/advertising tweets mentioning Rob Schutz and/or I recently wrote about Rob and his...

NameJet Announces Platform Enhancements

Last Summer, NameJet made some "big changes" to its platform. In essence, NameJet appears to have become a clone of Snapnames, its sister auction...

Rationale Behind Acquisition

It's not often that we hear from the founders of a company to discuss why they spent what they did to acquire a specific...

.Bet Domain Name Acquired for 5 Figures, Reportedly Resold for $600k

According to a tweet from Identity Digital (formerly Donuts), the domain name reportedly sold for $600,000. I have not verified or researched the...