UDRP Filed Against Qualcomm’s IMOD.com Domain Name (Update)

imod.com udrp

I don’t regularly see UDRPs filed against domain names owned by large corporations. It looks like a company has filed a UDRP against IMOD.com, a domain name owned by Qualcomm. The UDRP was filed at the World Intellectual Property Organization, and it is UDRP case D2016-1327.

The IMOD.com domain name was created in April of 2002, although it had previously had been registered before that and later expired. According to DomainTools Whois History Tool, the earliest entry showing Qualcomm as registrant is from July of 2006. The previous Whois History entry is from 2005, so Qualcomm may have owned it before this date.

If you visit IMOD.com, you are taken to a Qualcomm Mirasol page within the Qualcomm website. I did a Google search for Qualcomm and IMOD to see what the relationship is, and I learned that IMOD stands for “interferometric modulation.” You can read more about IMOD and Qualcomm’s Mirosol technology on this page within the Qualcomm website.

The complainant in this UDRP filing is an entity called American Franchise Marketing Limited. I was curious about the complainant in this UDRP and its connection to IMOD, so I did a Google search for the company name and IMOD. I found a trademark listing for “IMOD” on the TMDB.EU website, and it is listed as “European Community Trademark, no. 005126561, Word mark.” It looks like the trademark was registered in 2009, although I don’t know the history of the usage of the trademark.

One of the three aspects a complainant needs to prove is that the domain name “has been registered and is being used in bad faith.” I have no idea why this complainant thinks that Qualcomm registered and used the domain name in bad faith, since it seems very clear to me that Qualcomm is using it legitimately. I would not be surprised to see a RDNH finding here given the circumstances that I am able to see.

As with all UDRP proceedings like this, I will keep my eye on the decision to see if there is more to it than meets the eye.

Update: According to UDRPSearch.com, the complaint has been denied. The decision has not yet been published.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Consider Removing “WHOIS” from Domain Name Contracts

0
I use several different domain name purchase or sale agreements depending on the situation. Each of these agreements references "WHOIS" as a means of...

I Appreciate Having a Broker as a Counterparty

1
I appreciate being able to discuss the sale of a domain name with a domain broker representing a third party. Not only does this...

Gong.com UDRP Should be RDNH

1
The Gong Show was a television talent show on ABC in the late 1970s. Contestants would perform a variety of acts while being judged...

Top 5 Domain Names in 2025 Super Bowl Commercials

3
The Super Bowl was played last night, and a great deal of attention was on the Super Bowl commercials. In the recent past, domain...

Samba.com Now Forwarding to Samba.tv

3
Three weeks ago, Samba.com sold for $143,000 in a NameJet expiry auction. Samba.com is an exceptional domain name, and there are many branded companies...