Subject of UDRP (Updated)

A UDRP was filed against the domain name at the World Intellectual Property Organization. The preceding is listed as WIPO Case D2016-2187, and it was filed by a company called Rosefield Watches B.V.

The domain name has a creation date of August 13, 2002, and it looks like it is registered to an entity in Colorado. Historical Whois records at DomainTools show me that the domain name has been owned by the same registrant since at least 2011. I do not see any sale records for this domain name in NameBio. I visited the domain name this morning, and it is showing some sort of real estate landing page with a advertisment:


The complainant in this case seems to be a watch company called Rosefield Watches. The company appears to operate on the exact match, a domain name that was registered in 2014. Assuming it is the same Rosefield Watches, the company’s LinkedIn page says it was founded in 2014.

There are a number of reasons why I don’t see how the complainant will prevail in this UDRP. When I initially saw the domain name, I thought of a “rose field” as in a field of roses. I also noticed that there appear to be geographic areas and developments called Rosefield or Rose Field. In addition Rosefield is a last name. In my opinion, that would suggest this domain name is generic in nature. Additionally, because the domain name was created well before the listed founding date – and the current owner has owned it at least several years beyond that – I don’t see how it could be considered registered in bad faith. Finally, it is being used in a manner that doesn’t suggest is being used in bad faith.

Obviously, I don’t know if there is more to this that I can’t see, so we will need to wait until the UDRP decision is rendered to get the facts. My guess is that this one will go in favor of the domain name owner.

Update: According to, the UDRP has been denied. The decision has not yet been published, so I am not sure of the details. The domain name will remain with the owner. Decision was published: no Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn
  1. Getting sick of “nothing to lose” udrp’s that are nothing more than obvious hail Mary efforts to steal a .COM domain. I was hoping that the new gtlds would catch on to alleviate this, but it seems kinda obvious that this simply is not going to happen since .whatevers continue to lose value and appeal.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Poll: Are You Going to ICANN 79?

The ICANN 79 Community Forum Meeting is coming up in a couple of weeks. The meeting will be held in Puerto Rico from March...

Domain Broker’s Ad Campaign Highlighted by X Business with a Repost from Elon Musk

When looking at domain investor Twitter, I've noticed a few promoted/advertising tweets mentioning Rob Schutz and/or I recently wrote about Rob and his...

NameJet Announces Platform Enhancements

Last Summer, NameJet made some "big changes" to its platform. In essence, NameJet appears to have become a clone of Snapnames, its sister auction...

Rationale Behind Acquisition

It's not often that we hear from the founders of a company to discuss why they spent what they did to acquire a specific...

.Bet Domain Name Acquired for 5 Figures, Reportedly Resold for $600k

According to a tweet from Identity Digital (formerly Donuts), the domain name reportedly sold for $600,000. I have not verified or researched the...