Rightside Shares Premium Domain Sales Data

Rightside just published a blog post with some interesting insight into premium domain name sales from the new gTLD extensions it operates. The company noted that it intends to share more information now and in the future “[i]an effort to demystify Rightside premium domains.”

The first data release contains information about premium new gTLD domain names sales for 2016 year to date. I presume that by “premium” the company means domain names that it held back from being hand registered. I also presume those domain names have higher renewal costs, but that is more of a guess.

So far in the first quarter of 2016, the company has sold $674,610 worth of premium domain names. This is their wholesale revenue number and doesn’t count the total revenue that may have been charged by registrars. For instance, Rightside could have priced Rightside.Army at $100 but Name.com could have sold it for $1,000. The company has sold 12 of these premium domain names for $10k or more. The company has sold a total of 1,820 premium domain names at an average sale price of $372 per name. You can see more data on the Rightside blog.

In its blog post, the company also shared some of the individual sales it has closed year to date. The largest reported sale was for Bid.Auction, which sold for $20,000. The sale of Feirien.haus at $15,000 was the only other 5 figure deal the company disclosed.

I think releasing sales data will be helpful in its effort to show that there is a market for the company’s domain names. It’s also helpful to an observer like myself to see closed sales reported.

I am told this blog post is just the beginning of publicly disclosed sales data from Rightside, and I think it would be beneficial if other registries share their sales data as well.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Auction Platforms Shouldn’t Benefit from Default Bidders

3
If the winning bidder for a domain name auction does not pay and the auction platform offers the domain name to the next highest...

LTO is Betting on the Buyer and the Platform

2
When you agree to a lease-to-own (LTO) domain name deal, you’re making two bets: one on the buyer’s ability and willingness to complete the...

Andrew Rosener on Miss Understood Podcast

2
Andrew Rosener is one of the top domain brokers. I had to strike "one of" because I know as soon as I hit publish,...

Get Expiry Reports to Keep Sales Platforms Updated

4
For many years, I kept my portfolio at around 500 domain names. It was easy to manage those domain names on the sales platforms...

Confusion = Clicks = Confused

0
Domain investors loved earning PPC revenue from direct navigation traffic. It should be no surprise that many inquiries that stall or are confused are because...