Problem With Getting a “Valuable” Brand Domain Name

FacebookHome.comDuring a meeting yesterday, Facebook announced a new product dubbed “Facebook Home.” According to a TechCrunch article about the product launch, Facebook Home “replaces your standard Android’s homescreen with an immersive Facebook experience featuring full-screen photos, status updates, and notifications.

Like many domain investors likely did at around the same time of the news, I did a Whois search to see if Facebook had bought the domain name, and it appears that the company has owned it for quite some time. As  Bill Hartzer points out in an article on his blog, the company did not secure several alternative extensions for this particular product.

I think it’s arguable about whether Facebook needs to buy alternative extensions like and It’s unlikely that those domain names will get any traffic, even if the company decides to use its for more than a forwarder (it’s currently forwarding to However, the company might want to have control over those domain names to prevent someone else from using them in a manner that harms the company’s brand or confuses people into think they are Facebook properties.

It is sometimes reported that a domain owner “hit the lottery” when a company brands a new product or service and the domain name that matches the product or service belongs to someone else. However, unlike a keyword domain name (à la in the case of a potential Apple iWatch product), a brand domain name (such as may actually become a liability for the owner instead of a profit center.

Some people think they might be able to squeeze out some money for brand domain names, assuming the company would rather pay a few hundred or maybe even thousand dollars instead of paying for a UDRP. That may be true, especially if they want/need the domain name very soon. On the other hand, many companies value principle over all else, and they would rather file a lawsuit or a UDRP to discourage others from registering domain names with their branding.

A lawsuit can result in significant penalties, and even though a UDRP would not cost the domain owner anything if he or she chooses not to respond, it would leave a black mark on that person’s record, jeopardizing other domain holdings (others can cite previous UDRP losses in UDRP filings).

At the end of the day, while it might seem serendipitous that a company brands a product or service where you own that trademarked domain name, it’s more likely going to be a problem for the domain owner that will be a time and financial drain instead of a lucrative payout.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn


  1. Hey Eliott –

    As a regular reader who appreciates your attentiveness to grammar, spelling & proofreading, I strangely kept tripping up on the sentence:

    “However, when it’s a brand domain name and not a keyword domain name – ala in the case of a potential Apple iWatch product vs., the domain name may actually become a liability for the owner instead of a profit center.”

    Maybe I’m just sleepy/tired? I did understand your point (…but credit that more to your “hit the lottery” lead-in).

    A small word shuffle suggestion:

    “However, unlike a keyword domain name (à la in the case of a potential Apple iWatch product), a brand domain name (such as may actually become a liability for the owner instead of a profit center.”

    Kudos – for your exceptionally written blog!


  2. Looks like someone else owned before Facebook . wonder how that negotiation went down


    More, Brian
    VRE Unlimited
    7040 Avenida Encinas Suite 104
    PMB 300
    Carlsbad, California 92011
    United States
    +1.8776149101 Fax —

  3. If it hasn’t already happened, you may have just inspired the registration of countless names with products and an ‘i’ in front of them. I cannot wait until Apple wants from me! I’d love to be the guy who owns


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Rookie Mistake: Reading Expiry Lists at Breakfast

Every morning, as early as I am awake, I look through domain name expiry lists to see what is coming up for auction. I'll...

GoDaddy Auctions Running NameFind Auctions

GoDaddy is running a featured auction via its GoDaddy Auctions platform with domain names from its NameFind portfolio. While I would argue the domain...

Spaceship Hits 1 Million DUM – Only 13% of New Registrations are .com

Earlier this morning, Richard Kirkendall shared that Spaceship hit the 1 million Domains Under Management (DUM) mark. Richard is the Founder of Namecheap and...

Converse.CO UDRP Decision Turns on Price Inference

In general, I thought UDRP panels have gotten past the issue of pricing as it relates to generic / descriptive one word domain names....

Ebbs and Flows of Domain Investing

My domain investment portfolio has grown from around 500 domain names to around 2,000 domain names in the last several years. Even at that...