Maximal.com: Dropped by EMC / Dell and Sold for 5 Figures

One of the biggest auctions on the board today was Maximal.com. The domain name expired, was deleted, and it was caught by DropCatch.com. Maximal.com sold for $20,150.

Prior to expiring, Maximal.com had been owned by EMC Corporation, which is part of Dell. Because the domain name was registered at CSC, a company that offers corporate domain name registration services, it went into pending delete status after expiring.

Most domain registrars have deals with expiry auction platforms. Expired domain names are auctioned at a partner auction platform, and the registrar takes a cut of the sale price. If the registrar owns the auction platform, it takes all of the auction proceeds.

In the case of CSC, domain names owned by its clients that are allowed to expire go through the full deletion cycle. Drop catching services, like DropCatch.com, compete to catch these deleted domain names and then auction them to the highest bidder. CSC doesn’t take any profit when a CSC-registered domain name deletes.

While $20,150 is a drop in the bucket for a massive company like EMC Dell, it seems silly and wasteful to simply let a domain name like Maximal.com expire. Instead, Dell could have asked CSC to broker the sale of this domain name, allowing Dell to cash in on the asset. With CSC’s expertise coupled with EMC Dell’s long window to sell an asset like this, they could have achieved an optimal retail sale price rather than the domain name selling for a wholesale price.

At the end of the day, this is meaningless for a large company like Dell, but it is still surprising to see when they could have monetized the domain name.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Small Hurdle for Prospects When Afternic Self-Brokerage is Enabled

6
I enabled Afternic's self-brokerage option as soon as I heard it went live. I immediately tested it out with one of my own domain...

Self-Brokerage Available to 100k GoDaddy Customers

0
I am sure one of the most popular requests of GoDaddy is the ability to manage inbound purchase inquiries and offers for domain names...

LTO Usage Can Pose a Risk

3
Lease to Own deals have become much more normal in the domain space. LTO deals give buyers the opportunity to use a domain name...

Kicks.com Acquired by Dicks Sporting Goods

3
In early February, I noticed that Kicks.com changed hands. The valuable one word .com domain name had been owned by Reflex, and transferred to...

IBM Secures a RDNH Finding Without Asking

5
It looks like a UDRP was filed against https://t.co/1tWA9dHQ5m and https://t.co/wlPCjHdTyN at NAF. Both domain names are registered at CSC and owned by IBM....