Lawsuit: Was Purchased for $300,000

Theme Park Insider published an article about a lawsuit involving the owners of a theme park called Evermore and Taylor Swift. According to the article, the owners of the theme park filed the lawsuit “claiming that Swift’s album title, “Evermore,” infringed upon the park’s trademarked name.” While I am sure this is going to be an interesting case for some people to follow, the most interesting aspect of it comes from the section of the lawsuit regarding the theme park’s investment in the Evermore brand.

According to the complaint, which can be viewed on this Scribd page, the company purchased “the domain name EVERMORE.COM at a cost of $300,000.00.” I do not see a sale record for on NameBio, but that is not at all surprising given the fact that the vast majority of domain name sales are transacted privately and are not reported.

I can’t tell precisely when the domain name changed hands, but it appears to have been sometime in late 2017. In 2017, the domain name was owned by a registrant in Arizona, and in 2018, the domain name appears to be owned by the theme park. Because GoDaddy prevents some Whois information from being archived, the date the domain name changed hands is a bit unclear to me.

Archived pages on appear to confirm a 2017 transaction. The website for Evermore Enterprises appeared on as late as June of 2017, and the theme park’s website appeared on in August of 2017.

I am not sure if Ron Jackson would add a domain name sale to his DNJournal sales chart based on information in a lawsuit. If he does decide this is sufficient to archive the sale, it would tie for the 18th largest publicly reported domain name sale of 2017. was also sold for $300,000 in 2017. is a great domain name, and it’s nice to hear about domain name sales like this.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn


  1. It seems pretty obvious that this is a ill-conceived “shakedown” on Taylor Swift because she is such a visible target.

    I don’t think this lawsuit will get very far with the judge. In fact, I think they are seriously risking a jaw-dropping counterclaim by Taylor.

  2. I didn’t think you could trademark titles — albums, songs, books, movies — except in the franchise ones like Star Wars, Harry Potter, Startrek, Indiana Jones, etc

    This suit will get dismissed unless Taylor pays a nuisance settlement which I doubt she will

    have to admit – I love ever(one word).com domains — sold several over the years but no 6 figure sales like


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Rookie Mistake: Reading Expiry Lists at Breakfast

Every morning, as early as I am awake, I look through domain name expiry lists to see what is coming up for auction. I'll...

GoDaddy Auctions Running NameFind Auctions

GoDaddy is running a featured auction via its GoDaddy Auctions platform with domain names from its NameFind portfolio. While I would argue the domain...

Spaceship Hits 1 Million DUM – Only 13% of New Registrations are .com

Earlier this morning, Richard Kirkendall shared that Spaceship hit the 1 million Domains Under Management (DUM) mark. Richard is the Founder of Namecheap and...

Converse.CO UDRP Decision Turns on Price Inference

In general, I thought UDRP panels have gotten past the issue of pricing as it relates to generic / descriptive one word domain names....

Ebbs and Flows of Domain Investing

My domain investment portfolio has grown from around 500 domain names to around 2,000 domain names in the last several years. Even at that...