Join the ICA Already

Mike Berkens has a great post that I think everyone who has invested in domain names should read. Large corporations have been trying to take our generic domain names for us for some time via UDRP, and the Snowe legislation will make it much, much easier and even less expensive.   Just to reiterate the most potentially damaging section of the Snowe legislation in case you might have missed it:
SEC. 3.(b)(1)(A)
“…such domain name is or contains the identical name or brand name of, or is confusingly similar to the name or brand name of a government office, nonprofit organization, business, or other entity;”

In short, this is considerably more broad than the Lanham Act, which targets cybersquatters from owning trademark-related domain names. The bill was presented as a “Anti-Phishing” bill, but you wouldn’t have to be involved in phishing or anything nefarious to have your domain name taken under this provision.
A company can claim that your generic domain name is confusingly similar to their name, and they can ask the Attorney General to go after the domain name owner.   The owner can be liable for up to $6,000,000 (yes, SIX MILLION DOLLARS) in damages. The threat of a lawsuit like this will have a severe impact on domain values. Who would spend $10k on a domain name if a larger company can poach it?
As I see it, the Internet Commerce Association is the only group standing up for domain investors. Sure, other large domain companies have much to lose, but we can’t rely on them to lobby for us.   Most will lobby for their own purposes.   When a large company files a UDRP against a trademark domain name that is making good PPC revenue, do you see the parking company help the owner defend his name so they can continue monetizing it? NO. So why should you rely on large companies to foot the bill?
The funny thing is that domain owners are mostly entrepreneurs trying to start their own business online. They are real go-getters. From the looks of Mike’s post, it seems that most domain owners are sitting on their hands. Why? Please tell me why you aren’t joining the ICA.
This isn’t a fund to pay for Rick’s next floral shirt or another addition to Frank’s palace.   THIS IS TO PREVENT THE SNOWE BILL FROM BEING PASSED TO SAVE THE DOMAIN INDUSTRY!
If you have no good reason not to do it, please join the ICA or make a donation – it’s 80% tax deductible. The industry needs everyone to help.
I will also match contributions – up to $1,000. In the comment box, mention Elliot’s Blog, and they will let me know how much I need to send.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn
  1. Great post, Elliot.
    If someone considers their domaining to be a hobby, don’t join. But anyone who considers themselves a professional domainer needs to join the ICA immediately

    I actually disagree. Up until last November, domain investing was a hobby for me, but I did well enough that the Snowe Bill would have a major impact. I think anyone who has spent any kind of money should join or donate.

  2. Due to it’s high cost (and imo) general lack of transparency in this biz, I think I’ll take a pass.

    ICA = The Big Domainers and Big Parking companies. (I receive a lot of spam about ICA from my own parking company.)

    The small start up domainer has never been supported all that well, and I don’t expect ICA to give two hoots either.

    Meanwhile, I’ll be developing my best domains and let the chips fall where they may with the others.

    I don’t think that’s the case at all. Why should the wealthy domain investors have to foot the bill for those who don’t have as much money? I am not one of the wealthy guys, but I need to protect my interests, and the ICA is defending the rights of all domain registrants. I think if you have any money invested in domain names, you should either join or donate. The ICA does represent us – not just the biggest people in the business.

  3. I am quiet happy to kick this off. Your blog alone is worth the entry and donation fee and I’m far from a professional in this field but hope to be one day.
    Ive just donated $750 and registered as an affilated member. ICA payment reference is – ICA order #93 for graham haynes.
    Keep the blog and enthusiasm up Elliot.

    Thank you!

  4. Ms Domainer:
    I’m sympathetic to your feelings, but you have to realize that YOUR participation matters. Regardless of the size of your portfolio, your vote counts the same as mine or anyone else. BTW: Ms Domainer is a great name. It has a much better ring than Ms. Small Domainer 🙂


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Poll: Are You Going to ICANN 79?

The ICANN 79 Community Forum Meeting is coming up in a couple of weeks. The meeting will be held in Puerto Rico from March...

Domain Broker’s Ad Campaign Highlighted by X Business with a Repost from Elon Musk

When looking at domain investor Twitter, I've noticed a few promoted/advertising tweets mentioning Rob Schutz and/or I recently wrote about Rob and his...

NameJet Announces Platform Enhancements

Last Summer, NameJet made some "big changes" to its platform. In essence, NameJet appears to have become a clone of Snapnames, its sister auction...

Rationale Behind Acquisition

It's not often that we hear from the founders of a company to discuss why they spent what they did to acquire a specific...

.Bet Domain Name Acquired for 5 Figures, Reportedly Resold for $600k

According to a tweet from Identity Digital (formerly Donuts), the domain name reportedly sold for $600,000. I have not verified or researched the...