EFF Comments on .Org Contract Renewal

There has been an uproar since ICANN approved the new .org contract without price caps. The ICA posted some scathing remarks about the contract renewal. NameCheap also took a stand and posted a strongly worded response to the contract renewal and its process. In addition, NameCheap filed a Request for Reconsideration, a longshot attempt at getting the ICANN board to reconsider the contract renewal.

In addition to concern about the removal of price caps for .org domain names, there is also concern about the addition of the Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) as a trademark enforcement mechanism. The URS was created for the new domain name extensions, but trademark interests can use it for .org domain names, as a result of the new .org contract.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) weighed in on the addition of the URS for .org domain names in a blog post yesterday. Here’s an excerpt from the post, summarizing the organization’s thoughts on ICANN allowing trademark interests to use the URS for .org domain names:

“URS is a bad fit for .org, the third most-used domain and home to millions of nonprofit organizations (including, of course, eff.org). The .org domain has been around since 1985, long before ICANN was created. And with over ten million names already registered, there’s no reason to expect a “land rush” of people snatching up the names of popular brands and holding them for ransom.

When nonprofit organizations use brand names and other commercial trademarks, it’s often to call out corporations for their misdeeds—a classic First Amendment-protected activity. That means challenges to domain names in .org need more careful, thorough consideration than URS can provide. Adding URS to the .org domain puts nonprofit organizations who strive to hold powerful corporations and governments accountable at risk of losing their domain names, effectively removing those organizations from the Internet until they can register a new name and teach the public how to find it. Losing a domain name means losing search engine placement, breaking every inbound link to the website, and knocking email and other vital services offline.”

Like NameCheap, the EFF also filed a Request for Reconsideration to the ICANN board. It remains to be seen what impact the EFF will have on this contract renewal, but it seems pretty clear that many people are not happy with the renewal decision.

Thanks to John for sharing this article with me.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Domain Academy Offering Free “Domain Detox” Webinar

2
As my portfolio has become larger, I have been spending more time evaluating whether to renew domain names or let them expire and save...

Samba.com Expiry Auction Winning Bid was $143,000

2
Samba.com was the most exciting expiry auction I've been following for a while. The domain name had once been owned by a company in...

Spaceship Offering .coms Below Wholesale Pricing

1
The wholesale price of a .com domain name charged by Verisign (the .com registry operator) is approaching $10/year. I currently pay a little more...

Macro.com Was Acquired for $600k in 2022

1
In 2023, I noticed a company called Macro had announced a big funding round, and it was using Macro.com for its website. Its brand...

My Portfolio is Now 7.5% Non .com with a 10% Goal

1
For years, I would almost never touch non .com domain names. Reflecting changes I have noticed across the aftermarket, my viewpoint has been evolving....