Domain Gang Fools

It’s very likely that people who follow domain investing blogs and forums know that is a satirical website with Onion-esque articles. Although there are occasionally articles that are factual, the majority seem to be written to get a chuckle from readers.

Yesterday, Domain Gang posted a humorous article entitled, Singapore domainer gets jail for .XXX domain registration, which was a fictious story about a person who bought a .XXX domain name and was arrested for violating a law in Singapore. To me at least, it seemed pretty obvious that it was a work of fiction rather than a factual story.

Apparently the journalists at thought otherwise and posted their own article based on the Domain Gang story. In addition, a French website also picked up on the story and posted their own  article, and there were over 60 comments.    I guess they didn’t bother to check facts.

In this day and age, the first website to post an article generally gets most of the links and traffic. However, people, especially those who are journalists, really do need to check facts before posting an article. Congrats to Domain Gang on the

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn


  1. hi Elliot – it’s not the first time this happens; in the past, articles about Sergei Putanov and his dot communism initiative, or the Australian aboriginal domainer or even the Yo! programming language by Yahoo have been picked by mainstream media.

    The Singapore article adds the controversy of police violence – something very real in Singapore, hence the media attention and reaction. However, someone that reads instead of *skimming* should realize that a tomato and papaya producer from Singapore would have little worries about securing his trademark in .xxx 🙂

    Due to the exceptional number of visits to the article – more than 5,000 so far – we’ve added a small disclaimer at the bottom, to help the media realize their own fault to perform research.

    “It’s on the Internet – therefore, it’s true!”

  2. It would have been soooo easy just to Google the name of the made-up suspect.

    If he indeed “produces papaya and tomato pulp that is famous all over Singapore” then you’d expect to find at least one reference to him, somewhere.

    Google “Jiaming Sim” now and you’re going to find 75 places that have repeated DomainGang’s story, and nothing else.

  3. *

    The media are such lemmings and believe just about anything that comes their way. The DomainGang article was obviously satire, even by mainstream media standards.

    Recently, I uncovered a Consumer Reports ranking on commercial diets.

    The number 1 diet (according to CR) was based on a study that had been financed by, guess what, the winning diet program!

    So the number 1 program is number 1 because Number 1 said so!

    The mainstream media picked up the CR ranking, and suddenly, across the internet, it’s gospel. I have tried emailing several media outlets, but the media are stubborn and tend NOT to retract when their goofs are revealed.

    On at least one occasion, I have been guilty of this silliness, but at least when it was pointed out to me I had the sense to be ashamed and apologize.


    The media need to stop being so lazy; they have this great right (freedom of speech), but they need to pay more attention to the great responsibility that comes with it.

    A simple email to Theo would have taken a few seconds and would have saved these outlets much embarassment.


  4. Acro,

    I visit and like

    However, I’m sure most readers, and perhaps, all domainers are not supporting the idea of mixing true stories with the satirical ones, even tho you post the 100% on true stories, I believe that it’s probably best to be one or the other. In essence becoming 100% satirical (parody).

    Maybe folks are uncomfortable to tell you how to run your site. But, we who truly love your work are not afraid to say: it’s partly your fault when the MSM get’s it wrong. I think it’s 97%’s fault that Geek screwed up.

    Just make it 100% parody. The few news items broken on domain gang can be featured at (.com).

    Just my opinion.

    • @ Theo

      I tend to agree with Uzoma about keeping DG satire so there’s no chance of confusion. I don’t think the Onion has “real” news stories because of the chance of confusion. I think has significantly more authority when it comes to news and opinion, so the real news stories are better served there. I think Geek and all others should have done their own research to realize it’s clearly satire, so I don’t have sympathy for them.

  5. If you believe what is written on all the websites, then you are a “SUCKER”

    Do you own research!!!

    Always be cynical and skeptical on the internet as all sites are totally “BullS” and this is proven by McAfee that 99.99999% on the net are spam- my, worthless and time waster except


    do you buy a house/car just by reading what is describe on the site?

  6. I agree with Elliot and Uzoma. I think Theo is a great guy and does a great job but the mixing absolutely doesn’t work. The badge isn’t enough and I have to look at the bottom to see if it’s a real story or not. I agree keeping the real articles at another site would be ideal but then the traffic gets split and advertisers want traffic. He could divide the site into two halves.

  7. I agree with everyone else who said to make it all satire. I personally pass over it in the feed because I don’t want to sift through wether it’s real or not. 2cents

  8. Thank you all for your ‘concerns’ about mixing real stories with parody content. I have no plans to ‘undo’ the current mixed presentation, for many reasons.

    The truth is that real content, including many breaking stories drive a large percentage of the DomainGang traffic. It also leaves it to the non initiated to decide whether a story is 100% true or not – if their reading skills aren’t that focused, hence, more time spent on the site and more clicking around.

    DomainGang has always had 100% real content from the beginning; it was simply harder to identify. Since the introduction of the “100%” image in July of 2010 it’s easy for regular readers to comprehend what they are reading.

    As I said, I am not concerned about readers that aren’t domainers, they provide a large chunk of traffic from Google searches. If I were to hold everyone’s hand about the stories I’d spend most of my time doing support for free.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Rookie Mistake: Reading Expiry Lists at Breakfast

Every morning, as early as I am awake, I look through domain name expiry lists to see what is coming up for auction. I'll...

GoDaddy Auctions Running NameFind Auctions

GoDaddy is running a featured auction via its GoDaddy Auctions platform with domain names from its NameFind portfolio. While I would argue the domain...

Spaceship Hits 1 Million DUM – Only 13% of New Registrations are .com

Earlier this morning, Richard Kirkendall shared that Spaceship hit the 1 million Domains Under Management (DUM) mark. Richard is the Founder of Namecheap and...

Converse.CO UDRP Decision Turns on Price Inference

In general, I thought UDRP panels have gotten past the issue of pricing as it relates to generic / descriptive one word domain names....

Ebbs and Flows of Domain Investing

My domain investment portfolio has grown from around 500 domain names to around 2,000 domain names in the last several years. Even at that...