Bloggers Beware: Lift Content and You May be Sued by Copyright Owner

Every day, I see pingbacks to articles I write from websites I’ve never heard of that seem to be made for Adsense news aggregators. Most seem to focus on a specific topic, and because that topic was discussed in my article, the site poached all or part of my article for their benefit.

Although I have yet to file a lawsuit, I have sent plenty of takedown notices to frequent violators and their hosting companies (I bet this article will get picked up because “hosting companies” is a popular term for content thieves). Similar to my situation are newspapers and websites that post daily articles written by professional journalists. This content is often “borrowed” or used by bloggers and other websites without permission. According to an article today in, there’s a new company that aims to make money from these copyright violations.

A Las Vegas company called Righthaven apparently has been filing lawsuits for its clients whose rights they believe were violated under US Copyright Laws by content thieves and poachers. The penalties for Copyright Act violations are pretty severe, and many bloggers and websites may prefer to settle them without going to court to save time, stress, and money. With millions of potential targets, this could conceivably be a high-yielding endeavor for the company.

Content providers and publishers need to do as much as they can to protect their content, and lawsuits are a way to show that the copyright owner is serious and isn’t going to mess around. For bloggers and journalists who quote articles and attribute the source of those quotes, it may be a bit dicey if you get caught up in one of these lawsuits.

It’s important that bloggers and writers know the copyright law and be sure to follow it. I know there are plenty of people who think they’re safe posting all or part of an article as long as they link back to the source, but this certainly seems to be a false sense of security.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn


  1. Just goes to show that if you’re a blogger then you need to start acting like a real journalist, one who quotes and links out to their source(s) rather than just copy/pasting stuff.

    If you’re going to copy someone’s content, at least take the time to rewrite it. And for those of you who are lazy or just don’t have the time to rewrite it, there are even programs (article spinners) and wordpress plugins that will rewrite content for you.

  2. @ Viper

    I wouldn’t mess with a company that’s made it known they are more than willing to go the legal route. If you ask me, that’s just looking for trouble.

  3. @Bill

    “Just goes to show that if you’re a blogger then you need to start acting like a real journalist, one who quotes and links out to their source(s) rather than just copy/pasting stuff.”

    I can’t count the number of times I’ve seen stuff “lifted” from Ron Jackson’s DNJournal over the years.

  4. Elliot,

    This happens on a daily basis.

    Back in 2008 we created a Domaining Wiki and then found most of the content “borrowed” by people selling ebooks on domaining. Its pathetic.

    Earlier this week I saw a few domainers “lift some ideas” out of our blog posts without actually acknowledging where they came from.

    Unfortunately its one of those things that we have to deal with as bloggers and journalists.


  5. They pound on me all the time. I have found them on several forum sites I operate scraping messages.

    I have been looking for a way to identify them like spammers so I can keep a real time blockade running without wasting my ime doing it manually.

    We have peoplle looking for an identifying spammers in real time and updating our mail server. Why no do this for scrappers?

    2 cents worth

  6. El,

    Tell me if i’m wrong, but isn’t it better to have these sites pull your content and links to upgrade your link status for better SE PR?

    That’s been my understanding. If not… yipes, I have a lot of deleting to do!

  7. Stephen. Please explain.
    My situation involved scrapping of a forum and reposting it in asia as their own content. That does not help anything I know of. But then again, what do I know?

  8. @ Stephen

    Most of these sites have no PR or inlinks and are only doing it on the off-chance someone finds them in Google and clicks an Adsense link. I don’t think it does me any good.

  9. “I know there are plenty of people who think they’re safe posting all or part of an article as long as they link back to the source, but this certainly seems to be a false sense of security.” In terms of law, is it illegal? I mean there can be an article that aims to make a reply to some certain post on another site, they probably will have to copy some parts from that post in order to reply right…given that they link back to the original post? What do you think?

    • @ Soud

      It’s not criminal so you probably won’t get arrested, but there are civil penalties for stealing content, and those rules and penalties are outlined in the US Copyright Act.

    • @ Soud

      IMO, that’s not stealing content, but rather quoting it to analyze. There are many sites that take my full article and post it with just a link back. They aren’t doing it for analysis but are doing it hoping that someone stumbles across their site and click on advertising – or just to build traffic to their site. Just about every blogger/website deals with this.

  10. Quoting and giving credit with a link is the acceptable way to copy other people’s content. Even then you should only quote excerpts that relate to your need to quote, as in discussing a point in the article.
    I make people do that on my forums so the members don’t have to run all over the Internet following links. But if they want to read the entire article, the link is there.
    Am I stupid (don’t answer that) or is that the accepted way to use other people’s content in your content?

  11. @ Steve

    I don’t know you well enough to assess whether or not you are stupid, but I think that’s an acceptable way to use other people’s content 🙂

  12. There are a few dozen blogs that republish my RSS feeds. I figured I could spend my time shooting cannons at mosquitos, or I could make sure to drop links and attributions of my own in my posts. As long as those are still there (and generally they are – most people don’t take the time to strip them out) I’m not bothered by that.

    On the other hand, people (mostly TV and newspaper websites, who should know better) will swipe my content very blatantly – sometimes down to the very css – and then blame it on “an intern” when called out. I haven’t had to resort to lawyers yet – generally making a stink about it on twitter and posting adjacent screenshots (or threatening to do so) will do the trick.

    When you see someone swiping your content and think you might want to do something about it, the very first thing you do is take screenshots. Lots and lots of screenshots.

  13. Some of those advertisements for get-rich-at-home methods advise the creation of ebooks for sale as one way to get money. I wonder how many of those unknowledgeable people simply go to various sites and collect enough text to massage into book format to be sold off.

    It reminds me of people who go into public libraries to steal some of the “better” books to resell on eBay.

  14. @ El and Steve C

    The only blog feed suckups I see linking up to my content is just one: DNCRUNCH.COM

    For some reason, I have this opinion that this is a good site. Not really familiar with it, but it’s owned by Wesley Perkins in the UK.

    Seems nice enough. Should I put him on my “Viking Longship Adventure” list? lol

  15. Righthaven was grubstake’d by the people who own the media company they are calling their “client”.

    It’s more of a shakedown than a way to protect their copyrights. They even filed lawsuit against one of their own sources for quoting the article he was featured in!!

    Maybe their greed has got the best of them. They slowed down suing little old ladies with cat blogs and are now focused on The Drudge Report and other big names.

  16. Well my content keeps getting reposted on numerous sites, but what’s bugging me the whole time is the use of copyrighted materials we get from big companies.

    We have manage to contact most of them, asking for the use and crediting of their work, and almost all agree of posting their press releases and photos on our website.

    But the thing I wanted to ask you, would an e-mail from one of those companies be sufficient proof they allowed us to do so? How does the law work in that case?



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Poll: Are You Going to ICANN 79?

The ICANN 79 Community Forum Meeting is coming up in a couple of weeks. The meeting will be held in Puerto Rico from March...

Domain Broker’s Ad Campaign Highlighted by X Business with a Repost from Elon Musk

When looking at domain investor Twitter, I've noticed a few promoted/advertising tweets mentioning Rob Schutz and/or I recently wrote about Rob and his...

NameJet Announces Platform Enhancements

Last Summer, NameJet made some "big changes" to its platform. In essence, NameJet appears to have become a clone of Snapnames, its sister auction...

Rationale Behind Acquisition

It's not often that we hear from the founders of a company to discuss why they spent what they did to acquire a specific...

.Bet Domain Name Acquired for 5 Figures, Reportedly Resold for $600k

According to a tweet from Identity Digital (formerly Donuts), the domain name reportedly sold for $600,000. I have not verified or researched the...