Working With CADNA

I think there are reasons why people might want to consider supporting CADNA in their public goal of defeating cybersquatters and domain tasting/kiting. I believe most of the big organizations that support CADNA are simply trying to protect their brands/trademarks rather than go after generic domain names. Although Dell probably would kill for Computers.com or CustomComputers.com, they are more interested in making sure a typo name like DelComputer.com isn’t owned by someone other than them.

Dell (and similar companies) believe when a web surfer types that in to their browser, they are actually trying to get to Dell, so why should they have to pay to correct the error, and why should a cybersquatter be able to direct traffic to other computer companies when the person is looking for Dell and not someone else?

On their press release, CADNA stated, Cybersquatting is defined “as the bad-faith registration of a domain name that includes or is confusingly similar to someone else’s trademark.” This leads me to believe they want to protect trademark holders from obvious infringing domain names. As it stands at the present time, the domain tasting loophole basically allows people to register domain names for 5 days or less, and then they can drop these names. They are able to test the traffic, and they can make business decisions on which names to keep based on traffic, revenue, and of course the risk in owning it.

As of yet, trademark holders have been unable to act fast enough to respond to domain tasters, and that is where the problem is. I think there are significant hurdles that need to be overcome, as there is much grey area. For example, would Dell believe that a name like Del.com infringed on their trademark simply because the spelling was similar? I know that Dell owns Del.com, but what if they didn’t and the name were parked? There are many examples like this, and those would have to be overcome.

However, in the short run, I think it would be in our best interest to work alongside with CADNA, to ensure domain owner rights are kept in mind, while trying to stop people who blatantly trample on the rights of trademark holders using the domain tasting loophole.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

2 COMMENTS

Comments are closed.

Recent Posts

Pressure? Frank Schilling is a Top iPhone (and X) Gif

0
Over the weekend, I was texting some friends about buying tickets for a concert this Summer. One of our friends was suffering from a...

Cut Down on Spam Calls with Google Voice

2
My general preference is to register my domain names without Whois privacy enabled. The downside to that is my business phone number is exposed,...

Saved by the Down Button at NameJet

0
If you bid on auctions at NameJet, you're probably familiar with the up and down arrows in the control panel control panel buttons. These buttons...

Small Hurdle for Prospects When Afternic Self-Brokerage is Enabled

8
I enabled Afternic's self-brokerage option as soon as I heard it went live. I immediately tested it out with one of my own domain...

Self-Brokerage Available to 100k GoDaddy Customers

0
I am sure one of the most popular requests of GoDaddy is the ability to manage inbound purchase inquiries and offers for domain names...