Social.org Auction Back on NameJet

In March, Social.org sold for well over $200,000 on NameJet. Unfortunately for the seller and NameJet, the winning bidder failed to pay, and his account was suspended. I didn’t receive confirmation, but it would seem that the underbidders did not opt to move forward at their high bids either.

NameJet has re-scheduled the auction for Social.org, and the current high bid is $7,501. There are almost 350 bidders involved in the auction, many of whom presumably didn’t delete the name from their backorders and were re-entered after the first auction closed. The name will go to auction in a little over 16 days from today.

The lost sale is a bummer for a number of reasons, but one of the biggest issues is that there was considerable publicity for the auction, and the second time around will probably see much less coverage. It’s too bad the owner couldn’t (or didn’t) go after the person who placed the winning bid. Perhaps he could go after him legally if the second auction ends at a lower price than the first auction.

Hopefully there will be a better bidder verification system in place for this auction.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

6 COMMENTS

  1. “I didn’t receive confirmation, but it would seem that the underbidders did not opt to move forward at their high bids either.”

    I do not find the winning bid not paying all that odd, it happens. At this level of pricing though for the following bidders to not have had “real” interest either it makes you wonder. We are either looking at a system which is A)Down right shady B)The seller had multiple fake bids going or C)It is simply a case where several bidders who lost had no desire to buy the name after the fact for REAL!

    Now maybe it is just me but I generally do not throw around 6 figure offers or bids unless I REALLY want the name.

  2. If the second auction result means my prediction, in your competition, was closest to the final winning price I will sue you in court Elliot for my prize.

    Just saying 😉

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

.Bet Domain Name Acquired for 5 Figures, Reportedly Resold for $600k

7
According to a tweet from Identity Digital (formerly Donuts), the Bet.bet domain name reportedly sold for $600,000. I have not verified or researched the...

Finalize a Deal by Connecting on LinkedIn

1
When I agree to a negotiated deal on a platform like Dan or Sedo, I have always held the expectation that the payment will...

Google Ads Selects Squadhelp for Case Study

0
If you have visited a Squadhelp landing page, chances are good that you have seen their advertising when you visit other websites that have...

Reliance is “More than Metal” Following Upgrade

0
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. has existed as a business for more than 80 years and is publicly traded under the RS ticker symbol...

What to do with an Unused Domain Name

5
A person who has long owned a 3 letter .com domain name reached out to me to try and sell it. It's a nice...