SnapNames Employee Caught Bidding on Auctions

SnapNamesLogoI just received the following statement from Snapnames, and I wanted to share it with readers of my blog, who may have been impacted. Below the statement is some commentary and additional information from Snapnames.

“Recently,, Inc., discovered that an employee had set up an account on the SnapNames system under a false name and, under this name, bid in SnapNames auctions.   This is a clear violation of our internal policy and was not approved by the company.

Extent of impact

This conduct affected a small percentage of SnapNames auctions:
·                 Bidding affected approximately five percent of total SnapNames auctions since 2005, most of which occurred between 2005 and 2007, before SnapNames was acquired by Oversee.   To a much lesser extent, auctions in 2008 and 2009 were also impacted.
o               In less than one percent of these auctions, the employee won the auction
o               In the other four percent, the employee lost the auction
·                 The incremental revenue from the bidding represented approximately one percent of SnapNames auction revenues since 2005.

SnapNames further discovered that, on certain recent and limited occasions, when the employee won an auction, the employee secretly arranged to refund from SnapNames to the fictitious account a portion of the winning bid amount.

To avoid any question about whether the company benefited from this conduct, SnapNames will offer a rebate to impacted customers, including 5.22% interest (the highest applicable federal rate during the affected time period), of the difference between the prices they paid in winning auctions, and the prices they would have paid had the employee not bid in the auctions.   Impacted customers will be notified by SnapNames or its representative with instructions for the offer of a rebate.

SnapNames has already begun notifying customers of the situation.

SnapNames also has taken further action to ensure its policies regarding auctions are followed, and the company remains committed to taking whatever action is necessary to protect the integrity of its auction platform.

SnapNames deeply regrets this situation and is committed to addressing its customers’ needs quickly and fairly.

Customers with questions may contact:

By e-mail:                               
Phone:                                                   +1 (866) 690-6279 (toll-free in the U.S.)
+1 (503) 241-8547 (outside the U.S.)”


Last year, there were issues surrounding a Godaddy employee who was bidding on expired domain auctions. At the time told Domain Name Wire, “ employees are strictly disallowed from bidding against customers.”

Mason Cole, a spokesman for Snapnames has told me the company will not reveal the name of the employee, but DNN is reporting that the user name involved is “HALVAREZ.” The company will not disclose any legal matters related to whether charges are going to be filed against the employee.

One has to also wonder if has any recourse related to the private Snapnames acquisition. The bidding activity impacted revenues prior to the acquisition, and it also had an impact on bidding activity as well. I want to applaud for taking the actions they did and for coming forward with this information. I am sure it will hurt their bottom line, but their reputation is much more important.

I will post further information as I receive it.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn


  1. “This conduct affected a small percentage of SnapNames auctions”….that was said with tongue planted firmly in cheek!

    “Bidding affected approximately five percent of total SnapNames auctions since 2005,……..”…that is huge amount of auctions …going on for years!

    Stay tuned…more to come.


  2. Five percent of auctions and one percent of revenue over two years? YIKES!

    It’s good they are coming forward but to lead with “This conduct affected a small percentage of SnapNames auctions”?

    We are talking thousands of domain auctions and at least tens of thousands of bids. Since the employee lost most of the auctions, that means that the winning bidders paid a higher price in the tens of thousands of dollars.

    This is a BIG deal. No?

    I can see someone making a bad decision once but over a period of years?

    That’s trading on inside information and/or shill bidding or maybe even something criminal? I wonder what else he/she did from the inside. If this person acted on inside information he could have compromised other components of snapnames and perhaps even shared his inside information with outside parties.

    I would hope that this employee was fired. Odd that it didn’t say that in the email.

    The employee must be fired and even sued for damages.

    As far as the rebates, I’m not sure that’s enough. Sounds like we are talking about hundreds or even thousands of compromised auctions.

    How will the rebate be determined?

    What happens to the domains that the employee won?

    I’m guessing if you accept the rebate you won’t be able to sue for damages?

    Any mention that the employee was fired?

    If snapnames is giving out this information, we should know how they are handling the enforcement of their policies.

    Sounds like it could get messy.

  3. Seriously SnapNames,

    This HALVAREZ guy was in almost EVERY auction we were involved in dating back to sometime in 2003/2004.

    Most times the “entity” was simply doing nothing, however on plenty of occasions they would also bid as well. Bid well into the $300-$500’s, when it was just us and them chasing a domain. This really sucks for them.

    Clearly the have subtracted a number of years in the totals.

    Credibility surely down the drain.

    Best Regards,

    WebContents, Inc

  4. There is definitely more than one account involved in this fraud.

    I can count at least 3 accounts at snapnames that drove up prices on my auctions by tens of thousands of dollars in some cases.

    halavarez, hidden, vaxcis

  5. 1. Who is the source for halvarez being the bidder ID?

    2. From :

    What methodology did you use to determine the rebate being offered?

    SnapNames retained an experienced, independent accounting forensics firm to calculate the amount on a customer-by-customer basis, the precise amounts due to each. In the communication we’ll send through Rust Consulting, we can provide more detail about how figures were calculated.



    3. Scenarios:

    If I was the winning bidder, do they take my high bid all the way down to my bid just under Halvarez (if that’s the bidder)?

    What if I lost the auction to Halvarez? Do I get the domain?

    Does Halvarez get to keep all his ill gotten domains?

    I doubt rebates are going to make everybody happy.

    This is appearing to be a REAL mess for snapnames.

    Hey, maybe we all have some money AND domains coming our way. 🙂

    I’ve been an active buyer with snap since like 2001 when the started so it’ll be interesting to see what they offer me.

  6. Is this the only case of such fraudulent activity?

    We are big buyers and use quite a bit of competitive intelligence to analyze our prospective purchases including bidders and likelihood of acquisition, we found that on more than one instance the same handle was bidding and running up the price on a number of auctions and shifted a lot of our investment to private acquisitions.

    I would venture to say, this is not a one off case of “insider trading” if you would but that there are many cases of such issues particularly in venues such as Snapnames & Namejet.

    Transparency has been a cry for such a long time and for reasons non other than preventing this. Rest assured there is a lot more to come of this and of fraud in domain parking, domain brokering and many other facets of this business.

    It really is sad, as this only confirms what the outside world thinks of us, this industry has so much potential and is the pipeline of a lot of commerce but stories like this and those that are yet to come may be evidence why we are not taken seriously by the outside investment and marketing world.

  7. I got the same letter and this portion is telling:

    “SnapNames further discovered that, on certain recent and limited occasions, when the employee won an auction, the employee secretly arranged to refund from SnapNames to the fictitious account a portion of the winning bid amount.”

    To me the criminal is obviously SnapNames because they are benefiting from the shill bidding and condone this behavior through secret, or not, refunds to the employee.

  8. What about names that were going to auction but suddenly “cancelled” because the owner supposedly renewed? Those messages came from Nelson, and the names ended up with a Sedo parked page, and in a Moniker account.

    What happens to the domains now?

  9. Steve,

    I wouldn’t be too hard on snapnames. They are a great group of people.

    What that is referring to is their affiliate program. This bidder had the balls to bid in auctions AND use his affiliate link to get money back.

    The question is why did it take so long for snap to find this guy and has he dealt with anyone else inside or outside of snap?

  10. 5% of auctions.

    How many auctions does Snapnames have everyday?

    Let’s assume 500 auctions per day. That is 25 auctions per day and over 5 years that is 365*25 = 9125 auctions

    That may just be a low estimate!

    The number of people affected numbers at least in the thousands if not tens of thousands.

  11. Remedy is rediculous.

    The moment Halverez entered and auction the auction became poisoned.

    Then, any run ups towards the end due to Halverez should result in a refund of the bid of the PREVIOUS bidder.

    Halverez frequently made very significant run ups. Good faith reimbursement are going to have to go a LOT further than what I’m reading here. The fact the Nelson was know to many in the forums, and personally helped many of us as well, makes this far worse than just a bidding issue.

    This is yet another example of greed and back stabbing that I find very difficult to comprehend. And it seems to be getting more and more common in society in general.

    – Charles Christopher


    And now we’re all domain squatters. This coming from the former CEO of of all people.

    Seems like the shock waves are just getting out to other news sources.

    Great. Thanks douche bag at Snapnames whoever you are.

    You’re damn right I want a rebate but somehow I don’t think Snap is going to get off that easy.

    This could bring down all of Oversee. Of course I don’t want that to happen but one has to ask if this is an isolated case or are there other people acting inappropriately at Oversee?

    Why was this person not caught for MANY years?

    Unfortunately when you find one mouse, there are more.

  13. @fizz

    After reading Domain Name News and other blogs and forums where the person’s name was mentioned, I thought the name of the person had been confirmed officially. I’ve heard from several people that the person named is correct, but I still don’t feel comfortable posting the person’s name yet until I see official confirmation, so I removed the post.

  14. “And now we’re all domain squatters. This coming from the former CEO of of all people.”

    That was my greatest fear when I first heard about this. That it goes so far that congress gets involved, or even the UN. And no, I’m not joking.

    The desired to control the internet, and thus world commerce, should not be underestimated. People who use this to condemn our industry will do FAR more damage that Nelson. Nelson will just be the “excuse” for more regulations, taxes, etc.

    I don’t know how we do this, but we need to. We need to at least keep this to the current issue and bitch slap anybody that fans this fire!

    – Charles Christopher

  15. Sorry, I just don’t believe it.

    I could be wrong, wouldn’t be the first time, but he is
    brilliant enough to make (and did) a great legit income;
    doesn’t need to ripoff, steal, shill, lie, cheat, whatever.
    And certainly doesn’t strike me as greedy or deceitful.

    I’ll believe he was the company’s scapegoat until a court
    (if it comes to that) proves otherwise.

  16. Well, here’s proof that snapnames owes me money

    This screen cap shows me (I am whatever bidder ID) bidding against Halvarez from $59 to a winning bid of $160 with no other bidders in between. So, there’s $101 coming my way and I know I bid against Halvarez MANY MANY times.

    The latest that I can find Halvarez in one of my auctions is from March 2009

    If he is bidder ID ppppp too, I’m gonna be getting an even bigger check.

  17. Rust Consulting is a class action settlement firm (check out their website). Oversee’s planning ahead.

    5% interest is laughable. He made A LOT more than that monetizing and selling those domains.

    But I guess they can’t tell us about any pending litigation against Nelson.. yet.

  18. Rob,
    The advantage the insider had was that he could see your proxy bid. Using your example, he bid $10. less than your proxy bid.

    I was fortunate that I kept spreadsheets of my winning and losses back to 2003.

    Halvarez did not show up on my radar til May, 2005.

  19. Adam Dicker (a VP at Godaddy) bid at TDNAM auction(s) against clueless domainers, and procured at least SPYWARE.US in that fashion. Isn’t that the same thing Nelson did? Dicker keeps his job, and the domain. Godaddy changed their policy about employees bidding against clueless suckers, only after the farce was outed in domain forums. Adam Dicker didn’t get fired. In fact, I notice some of the comments here are by those who participate at, which Dicker owns.

    Why does Dicker get a pass and Nelson doesn’t? My feeling is that if Dicker got caught for one episode, he probably did it numerous times.

  20. seems snapnames isnt the only shady operator at all huh?
    Attention –

    Present and former customers of

    Class Action Lawsuit Against RegisterFly, ICANN, and ENOM
    Have you been denied or are you being denied access to your domain names that you have registered at

    Have you lost domain names despite attempting to renew them through or transfer them elsewhere?

    Have you been charged for services that were not delivered by

    Was the domain contact and/or ownership information changed without your permission to either or someone else entirely?

    It’s time to PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS >>


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Rookie Mistake: Reading Expiry Lists at Breakfast

Every morning, as early as I am awake, I look through domain name expiry lists to see what is coming up for auction. I'll...

GoDaddy Auctions Running NameFind Auctions

GoDaddy is running a featured auction via its GoDaddy Auctions platform with domain names from its NameFind portfolio. While I would argue the domain...

Spaceship Hits 1 Million DUM – Only 13% of New Registrations are .com

Earlier this morning, Richard Kirkendall shared that Spaceship hit the 1 million Domains Under Management (DUM) mark. Richard is the Founder of Namecheap and...

Converse.CO UDRP Decision Turns on Price Inference

In general, I thought UDRP panels have gotten past the issue of pricing as it relates to generic / descriptive one word domain names....

Ebbs and Flows of Domain Investing

My domain investment portfolio has grown from around 500 domain names to around 2,000 domain names in the last several years. Even at that...