It Looks Like Google Owns Zero.com

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about the Zero.com UDRP. Perhaps as a result of this UDRP filing, we now know who owns Zero.com: Google. Have a look at the current Whois record found at DomainTools. A screenshot of this current Whois record can be found below:

Google Owns Zero.com

Previously, Zero.com was registered to DNStination Inc. I believe this is the privacy service used by some registrants at the MarkMonitor domain registrar.

According to NameBio, “ZERO.COM last sold for $329,420 on 2010-10-24 at SnapNames.” Within a few months after the domain name changed hands in 2010, the domain name was registered to DNStination Inc. at MarkMonitor, according to a historical Whois record from March of 2011 archived at DomainTools. I believe the registration details for this domain name remained the same until this week, when Google became the registrant.

At the time of publication, it does not appear that Zero.com is being used. I also don’t see any record of an active website on Zero.com in the last several  years, according to Archive.org.

Although my guess is that Google was the owner before and this information became public as a result of the recent UDRP filing, I do not know this for certain. I suppose it is possible that the acquisition was recent, but I highly doubt that given that the domain name is currently the subject of a UDRP.

It is going to be interesting to see what happens with this UDRP and whether any type of litigation will follow.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn
  1. Now that the Complainant identity has been revealed, I think that Respondent, CKL Holdings N.V., owned by Michael Gleissner, will dismiss the UDRP … 🙂
    Probably other dismissals will follow …
    As I said before, I think Michael was ill-advised by somebody …

    • Typo, it should be read “Now that Respondent identity has been revealed, I think that Complainant, CKL Holdings N.V., owned by Michael Gleissner, will dismiss the UDRP … 🙂

    • Horsepucky, Andrea.

      They haven’t pulled the one on flammea.com, long owned by a guy named Paul Flammea and based on another of their BS junior trademark registrations.

      You are not a good liar.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Poll: Are You Going to ICANN 79?

2
The ICANN 79 Community Forum Meeting is coming up in a couple of weeks. The meeting will be held in Puerto Rico from March...

Domain Broker’s Ad Campaign Highlighted by X Business with a Repost from Elon Musk

0
When looking at domain investor Twitter, I've noticed a few promoted/advertising tweets mentioning Rob Schutz and/or Snagged.com. I recently wrote about Rob and his...

NameJet Announces Platform Enhancements

3
Last Summer, NameJet made some "big changes" to its platform. In essence, NameJet appears to have become a clone of Snapnames, its sister auction...

Rationale Behind CoFounders.com Acquisition

1
It's not often that we hear from the founders of a company to discuss why they spent what they did to acquire a specific...

.Bet Domain Name Acquired for 5 Figures, Reportedly Resold for $600k

9
According to a tweet from Identity Digital (formerly Donuts), the Bet.bet domain name reportedly sold for $600,000. I have not verified or researched the...