How Retailers are Using .BlackFriday Domain Names

Uniregistry launched its .BlackFriday new gTLD domain extension in July of 2014. According to, there are currently a bit more than  12,000 .BlackFriday domain names registered.

I wanted to see if and how major retailers are using .BlackFriday domain names. I looked at the exact match .BlackFriday domain names for 25 of the top 100 retailers, according to the National Retail Federation’s Top 100 Retailers 2015 list. To select the retailers that have an online presence and would be expected to have Black Friday deals, I used my judgment to create this list from the larger list of 100 retailers, eliminating brands like Jack in the Box and Wegman’s.

Here is a list of exact match .BlackFriday domain names for 25 major retailers and how each is being used:

  • Amazon.BlackFriday – Forwards to the Black Friday landing page on (Owned by Amazon)
  • Apple.BlackFriday – Does not resolve (owned by Apple)
  • BedBathAndBeyond.BlackFriday – Parked page (not owned by BBB)
  • CrateAndBarrel.BlackFriday – Does not resolved (unregistered)
  • Dell.BlackFriday – Forwards to an affiliate page (unregistered but seems to be monetized by my ISP, Fios)
  • Dillards.BlackFriday – Registrar landing page (not owned by Dillard’s)
  • DollarGeneral.BlackFriday – Registrar landing page (not owned by Dollar General)
  • FootLocker.BlackFriday – Domain name is suspended (not owned by Foot Locker)
  • GameStop.BlackFriday – Registrar landing page (not owned by Game Stop)
  • Gap.BlackFriday – Forwards to (Owned by Gap)
  • HomeDepot.BlackFriday – Does not resolve (owned by Home Depot)
  • Ikea.BlackFriday – Does not resolve (owned by Ikea)
  • JCPenney.BlackFriday– Registrar landing page (not owned by JC Penney)
  • Kohls.BlackFriday – Forwards to a blank page (not owned by Kohl’s)
  • Macys.BlackFriday – Forwards to a blank page (not owned by Macy’s)
  • Michaels.BlackFriday – Forwards to an affiliate page (unregistered but seems to be monetized by my ISP, Fios)
  • NeimanMarcus.BlackFriday – Does not resolved (unregistered)
  • Nordstrom.BlackFriday – Resolves to a landing page unaffiliated with the store
  • PetSmart.BlackFriday – Forwards to (privately registered)
  • Sears.BlackFriday – Forwards to a blank page (not owned by Sears)
  • Staples.BlackFriday – Does not resolve (owned by Staples)
  • Target.BlackFriday – Forwards to (owned by Target)
  • ToysRUs.BlackFriday – Forwards to a blank page (not owned by Toys R Us)
  • Walmart.BlackFriday – Does not resolve (owned by Walmart)
  • WilliamsSonoma.BlackFriday – Does not resolved (unregistered)

Out of the 25 domain names I queried, about 1/3 of them are registered by the brand. Some of these resolve to the correct website, but it seems like the majority of those do not resolve. Although I wouldn’t expect any traffic, I don’t see why they aren’t at least forwarded to the correct website, even if it is just one visitor.

I was surprised to see private registrants owning a great deal of these domain names. IMO, there is little to no aftermarket value for a brand .BlackFriday domain name and the risk seems to far outweigh any reward. A UDRP, URS, or even a lawsuit could be costly to defend and/or harm the owner’s reputation going forward.

I asked Uniregistry CEO Frank Schilling about the .BlackFriday extension, and he seemed pretty happy with the registration numbers. According to Frank, “the extension is miles ahead of where we thought it might be at this point in time.” He added, “[w]e are most pleased with the string and plan to start earnest direct-marketing efforts targeting Blackfriday in 2016 .. in 10 years we now feel like there are going to be 100,000 registrations which is incredible.”

It will be interesting to observe their marketing efforts, especially as it relates to major brands whose trademark domain names may already be registered.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn


    • There are millions and millions of trademarks, and a registry can’t be expected to protect them.

      IMO, the trademark owner has the obligation to protect their marks, not the registry.

      Also, I think it is foolish for domain investors to register domain names that have famous marks in them.

  1. How long does the registrant organization “FraudCast” expect to keep Nordstrom has a history of wins
    at WIPO against typos like Nordstom and aggressively protects it’s “RACK” TM as well.

    NORDRACK.COM is available, but you’d probably have NordicTrack and Nordstrom Rack after it.

    My entire wardrobe is Sam’s Club.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Poll: Are You Going to ICANN 79?

The ICANN 79 Community Forum Meeting is coming up in a couple of weeks. The meeting will be held in Puerto Rico from March...

Domain Broker’s Ad Campaign Highlighted by X Business with a Repost from Elon Musk

When looking at domain investor Twitter, I've noticed a few promoted/advertising tweets mentioning Rob Schutz and/or I recently wrote about Rob and his...

NameJet Announces Platform Enhancements

Last Summer, NameJet made some "big changes" to its platform. In essence, NameJet appears to have become a clone of Snapnames, its sister auction...

Rationale Behind Acquisition

It's not often that we hear from the founders of a company to discuss why they spent what they did to acquire a specific...

.Bet Domain Name Acquired for 5 Figures, Reportedly Resold for $600k

According to a tweet from Identity Digital (formerly Donuts), the domain name reportedly sold for $600,000. I have not verified or researched the...