CNBC Article Illustrates Positive Aspect of Dictionary .com

Mike Berkens shared a link to a CNBC article on Twitter about a company called Blockchain that just raised $40 million in funding. I think the article is a good illustration about why it is important for a business that uses a descriptive brand name to operate on the exact match  .com domain name.

While reading the article on my iPhone, I noticed that there was no url for the startup referenced or embedded. I know the company is called Blockchain, and I also know they are in the blockchain / cryptocurrency business. There are quite a few companies with Blockchain in their branding.

I (correctly) assumed the company operates on, so I was easily able to navigate to the website to learn more about them. This is the positive aspect of a dictionary .com domain name. People like myself assume a business operates on the exact match .com domain name – in this case, the high value Had I been incorrect, I may have ended up on the website of a totally different company, perhaps even a competitor.

If the company had gotten cute (and cheap) about their domain name, it would have been more difficult for me to find them. Since the company is called the same thing as their business, a Google search for “blockchain” would not have been all that helpful. I would have encountered quite a few other companies that are in this business, have “Blockchain” in their meta titles, or shared the same brand name. This may have led me to a competitor. This doesn’t even take the lack of authority or professionalism that I may have felt had they not operated on their exact match .com.

There are plenty of examples of when using an alternative domain name is fine. In this case, the CNBC article hit the nail on the head for why a company with a generic brand name needs to own its exact match .com domain name.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn


  1. Article from 5 years ago.

    $1,000 bounty for Blockchain.COM (not .info) (Updated to $1,500) owners info

    I will pay $1,000 USD worth of Bitcoins for the domain (not .info)

    The domain registration is private and the owner of the contact email doesn’t reply.

    If you are the owner, or can contact the owner please PM me.

    —————–Sept-7-2012 Update————————-

    I will pay $500 USD worth of bitcoin for a simple, verifiable, introduction to the owner of even if he doesn’t sell me the domain name.

    start your detective work!;topicseen

    I wonder how much they paid for it.

  2. is also in essence (check out the wallet link for instance).

    And try logging into your wallet using Firefox. I dare you. 😉


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

It Pays to Know Random Phrases

My eyes bulge out of my head sometimes when I see a somewhat obscure term in a domain name coming up for auction. Oftentimes,...

Monitor Landing or Parking Page Downtime

When I first started developing my domain names, I learned the importance of downtime monitoring. On some of my growing websites, there would be...

Squadhelp is Reinvesting and So Am I

Squadhelp CEO Darpan Munjal shared a series of tweets about the growth of the platform. Darpan shared that revenue last month was higher than...

If You Want to See a Stampede, Look No Further Than This…

If you're seeking engagement on Twitter in the domain name space, the best thing you can do is tell people you're looking to buy...

Nick Huber: “drop a little coin” for a Premium Domain Name

I do not know Nick Huber, but I see he has a large following on Twitter and frequently offers advice to startup founders and...