Celgene Files Lawsuit After It Lost a UDRP with RDNH

In February of this year, I wrote about Celgene’s UDRP filing against the CellGene.com domain name. The three member WIPO UDRP panel not only ruled against Celgene, but the panel found that the UDRP was a case of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH). The domain registrant was permitted to keep the domain name.

Following this UDRP loss, Celgene has apparently filed a cybersquatting lawsuit, according to Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review. Here’s what the publication wrote about the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) lawsuit filed by Celgene:

“In the suit, filed at the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia yesterday, May 29, Celgene claimed that cellgene.com was an example of “typosquatting” or “cybersquatting”, a process where a domain name is created with a typographical error to closely imitate a more reputable website.”

I believe the requirements to prove cybersquatting in a ACPA lawsuit are different than the UDRP requirements. I am not sure if the UDRP / RDNH decision will have any sort of impact on this federal lawsuit.

One thing I still find interesting is that the domain registrant had allegedly been willing to sell this domain name for $7,500 (according to the UDRP decision) and Celgene had been willing to buy it for $2,000. With this lawsuit, both parties are going to have substantial legal fees, and I suspect the cost will be much, much higher than $7,500.

I am not a lawyer, but I would imagine the domain registrant will file counterclaims against Celgene in the lawsuit, citing the RDNH finding from the UDRP decision.

Thanks to Josh Bourne for sharing this news via LinkedIn.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

5 COMMENTS

  1. It will be interesting to see the end result.
    Domain owner is still lucky since he is hong kong firm, so not much damage except loosing name, same thing doesn’t know he get any money out of it if he win.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Escrow.com: 2025 Master of Domains

1
Escrow.com announced the winners of its 2025 Master of Domains awards. The awards are typically given out during NamesCon, but the conference isn't being...

Odyssey.com is Braden Pollock’s Largest Domain Name Sale

0
Andrew Miller from Hilco Digital Assets announced that his company oversaw the sale of Odyssey.com on behalf of Braden Pollock. According to the LinkedIn...

$50k .AI Sale is Now Just Noteworthy

3
Tim Hargis alerted me to a LinkedIn post by Kushal Byatnal announcing that his company, Extend, had acquired the Extend.ai domain name for $50,000....

How I Choose LTO Length

2
I've been a big fan of lease to own deals for quite some time. Before Dan.com existed, I had several LTO deals, but they...

Kickstart Acquires Kickstart.com

1
Rob Schutz, who made an Ask Me Anything appearance with the ICA yesterday, announced the Kickstart.com domain name was acquired by a company called...