“Stuffing” .Site Domain Names

Rick Schwartz shared the content of an email he received from, in which he was given a .Site domain name. A Whois search reveals Rick owns, which is registered at The email to Rick offered him LastLaughs.Site, under the guise of’s “Brand Protection Program.”

I was curious about the company’s Brand Protection Program to see what that entails. When I did a Google search for “brand protection program” there were no results found.

Rick labeled this “stuffing,” because it is essentially stuffing his account with something he clearly doesn’t want or need. The domain registration is free for the first year, and presumably, the registrar hopes Rick and other clients will opt to pay to renew the domain name once it is up for renewal. In order to prevent the domain name from being automatically pushed into his account, Rick needs to proactively opt out.

In my opinion, this type of action should require a proactive opt-in – not the other way around.

I recall seeing this quite a while ago, and I thought this was a practice that no longer existed.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn


  1. This practice violates the ICANN RAA which requires affirmative registrant agreement to the registration terms. Instead of a blog post, this should be sent to ICANN Compliance.

  2. Logged into my Network Solutions account today and discovered they had “gifted” me with the .site equivalent of one of our domains. There was no introductory email announcing this. This did this previously with the .xyz extensions awhile back.

  3. Sue them—Class action lawsuit for extortion. This is like Wells Fargo opening accounts without the consent of the consumers.

    Sue Facebook too—the default is to accept 3rd party to sneak ,steal and use your data without your consent.

  4. We own I wonder if that’s any sort of violation? Maybe Rick will want to buy it? After all, a last laugh online is far better than a last laugh oncom. What do you think?

  5. Can I please get some .coms stuffed into my account? I’m happy to enter a list at my preferred registrar so you know what I want.

Leave a Reply

Recent Posts

Hilco Digital Assets Announces $10m Investment in Squadhelp

Squadhelp has become a leading brand naming marketplace, connecting business owners and entrepreneurs with domain names listed for sales on its platform. Led by...

Questions Related to Uni —> Afternic Parking Migration

If you are a Uniregistry customer, you most likely received an email explaining the upcoming migration of the Uniregistry Market and parking platform to...

Some Uni-Registered New gTLDs Will be Transferred to 1API

I received an email from Uni (formerly Uniregistry) that I initially thought was a Whois verification email and almost ignored. It was, in fact,...

Advice and Resources for a Newbie Domain Investor

Someone reached out to me on Twitter seeking advice for selling domain names. In a short tweet thread, I shared a few thoughts and... Now Forwarding to ChatGPT Website

Early this morning, Andy Booth tweeted about, asking if the domain name was acquired by ChatGPT. Andy presumably asked because the domain...