Home New gTLD Page 86

New gTLD

My Take on The gTLD Winners

20

Last week, I shared my gTLD  predictions, and today I want to discuss who I think will come out ahead when it comes to new gTLDs and why I believe they are going to do well. Ultimately, this is about who will benefit financially from the introduction and sale of gTLD domain names.

ICANN – At $185,000 per application plus fees from auctions, ICANN will certainly make a whole lot of money from the introduction of gTLDs. ICANN has also been mentioned in just about every tech and mainstream article about the new domain extensions, and that publicity probably helps the organization that is looked at as the “governing body of the Internet.”

Domain Registrars – Domain registrars such as Go Daddy, Name.com, NameCheap, and others are going to sell a lot of gTLD domain names. Domain registries are going to rely on consumer facing domain registrars for “shelf space” on the registration and checkout pages, and registrars will probably be given solid commissions for sales. I am sure the registrar executives will also receive perks from the registries to ensure good placement.

Domain Registries – The companies that sell gTLDs are arguably taking on most of the risk when it comes to the new TLDs. They have put up the most capital, and they have the most to lose. While I am quite sure there will be a number of registries that lose money, there are going to be plenty that make a mint. I also imagine there will be registry sales to larger companies once revenue streams are established. This is going to be a profitable endeavor for many.

gTLD Consultants – There’s an adage that during the gold rush, the people who made the most money were those selling picks and shovels to gold miners. There are a number of highly experienced domain consultants working with registries and auction houses on new TLDs. Because this market is so specialized, there aren’t that many qualified people to assist with applications, sales, and auctions. Therefore, these specialized gTLD consultants can charge premium consulting fees for their expertise.

Small Business Owners – Assuming Google will rank local business that use gTLDs in its search results, and I think it’s a safe assumption given Google’s own gTLD applications, small businesses will gain from having the opportunity to register better keyword (and possibly more memorable) domain names.

IP Lawyers – There will be lots of lawsuits I would imagine, and the lawyers will be paid win or lose. Lawyers with intellectual property experience who represent brands and trademark owners will be tasked to litigate, and they will make a fortune.

Sales Venues and Auction Providers – A strong aftermarket will help fuel gTLD sales, and registries will need the assistance of aftermarket sales venues and auction houses to hold special auctions.The market is going to get crowded with hundreds of new gTLDs, so these venues should be able to make out very well by brokering sales and holding auctions.

Domain Investors  – As I said in my predictions, I think there is likely going to be confusion and  convertible  error traffic. I also think some gTLD users will want to buy the matching .com domain names and will have to pay domain investor prices. I also believe that gTLD registries will need to have domain investors participate in the launch, and there will be deals to be had and flips to be made as a result. With all of the attention being paid to domain names, I think it will bring new money into the fold, although I think caution needs to be heeded with respect to new investors.

My gTLD Predictions

45

I’ve been investing in domain names for almost ten years, and I don’t believe we’ve yet seen anything that is going to have as big of an impact on our business as gTLDs. Hundreds of millions of dollars will be spent on these new domain extensions, and we are going to see our industry change as a result.

I want to share several predictions for the new gTLDs from a domain investor’s perspective.

  • Although the US had more applicants than other regions, gTLDs will be more widely used and popular abroad than in the US. ccTLDs are very popular outside the US, and as a result, people are more apt to look to the right of the dot outside US borders.
  • Domain investors will not embrace gTLDs as much as applicants may be modeling, and there will be some TLD registry failures as a result of the projections being inaccurate.
  • Owners of the keyword string .com names are going to be very happy. Some registries will feel the need to buy the corresponding .com names and pay a lot of money for them. In addition, there will likely be a ton of error traffic that pays well.
  • There will be  anomalous  sales in most of the “good” keyword TLDs that are similar to the $450,000 sale of Meet.ME. The key factor to these sales will be relevance to the keyword. For instance, Insurance.Gay might not be a great domain name, but Dating.Gay would be valuable.
  • Within 5-10 years, companies like Affilias and Verisign will benefit from failed registries because they will be able to acquire the user base and recurring revenue streams from “failing” registries. They likely have the ability to manage these TLDs better, and as a result, they can make key acquisitions when the opportunities present themselves.
  • A domain registrar is going to patent technology to be able to suggest a TLD for when someone goes to register a domain name. For instance, when someone tries to register CurtainsAndDraperies.com, the registrar will suggest CurtainsAndDraperies.Shop along with premium registry held names like Curtains.Shop.
  • Popular registrars are going to make a lot of money with new TLDs. There will be massive competition amongst registries for “shelf space” on the search page, and that will lead to strong margins for registrars on newly registered domain names and premium domain names.
  • There will be many deals made before registries go to auction, and there will be very few auctions. I can see some companies making millions of dollars by dropping out of the running instead of gambling with an auction.
  • Although there were many, many brand applications, I don’t think we will see many brand .TLDs used in marketing for a long time. I believe many brands sought their TLDs for defensive measures instead of for marketing purposes.
  • Companies with domain industry ties, like Donuts, Radix, TLDH, STRAAT, and Uniregistry (among others), are going to do very well with their TLDs. They know the business of selling domain names, and they should be able to translate that experience into gTLD sales.
  • Companies are going to spend hundreds of millions of dollars marketing their new TLDs, and that will lead to more awareness of domain names and domain investing. It will also bring new money into the fold, and there will be a lot more inexperienced people who think they can get rich quickly by buying and re-selling domain names.
  • There will be lots of litigation.

Please share your predictions if you’d like.

Watch Live: ICANN gTLD Reveal Day

Watch ICANN’s “Reveal Day” live from London. Hear from ICANN CEO Rod Beckstrom and others from ICANN as they reveal the list of gTLD applications. There will be a press conference followed by a break followed by questions from reporters and members of the audience.

Here is the PDF of gTLD applications and applicants.

Speaking and answering questions at today’s press conference from ICANN:

  • Rod Beckstrom, President and Chief Executive Officer
  • Kurt Pritz, Senior VP of Stakeholder Relations
  • John Jeffrey, General Counsel
  • Brad White, Director of Global Media Affairs

Juan Diego Calle’s STRAAT Investments Reveals gTLD Applications

Earlier this morning, Paul Sloan published an article on CNET about the new gTLDs, and he mentioned that Juan Diego Calle, founder of the .CO Registry, “is going after 13 new TLDs through the investment company that backed .co Internet.” I just received a press release from Calle’s STRAAT Investments detailing the company’s newest investment in gTLDs.

STRAAT Investments is applying for 13 domain extensions, and they will also be assisting one other applicant with a 14th TLD which will be revealed publicly tomorrow. The 13 TLDs are:

  • .APP
  • .BOOK
  • .CORP
  • .DESIGN
  • .GMBH
  • .GROUP
  • .INC
  • .LAW
  • .LLC
  • .LTD
  • .MOVIE
  • .TECH
  • .WEB

Straat will be leveraging its existing infrastructure and the assets of .CO to efficiently launch their new TLDs, but the .CO team will stay focused on growing the .CO space. Each TLD under management will have its own brand team, although I am quite sure they will also leverage its learnings from the past few years marketing .CO domain names.

One big question is how potentially hundreds of new TLDs will impact .CO, and the company acknowledges that there will be an impact. According to Jose Rasco, Managing Director of STRAAT, “New TLDs will definitely add some competitive pressures to .CO when they are launched. But in the long run, they will help us in transmitting the message to the general public that there is much more to the namespace than .com, that there are credible alternatives as evidenced by our successful launch, and that there is an unmet demand for new products.”

One thing that is apparent is the corporate TLD applications. One reason many .CO are buying .CO domain names is because .CO can stand for “Company.” STRAAT likely has seen this with its clients, and they are applying for TLDs like .LLC, .LTD, .INC, and .GMBH to sell to companies using these various business abbreviations.

ICANN’s “Reveal Day” is scheduled for June 13, 2012. All gTLD applicants and extensions will be announced during a press conference.

STRAAT Press Release follows:

5 With… Bhavin Turakhia Discussing His Company’s $30 Million gTLD Investment

Bhavin Turakhia is the CEO and Co-Founder of Directi, a technology conglomerate that owns and operates companies like Skenzo, LogicBoxes, ResellerClub, BigRock, and others. Working with his brother Divyank Turakhia, Directi is now reportedly worth “Worth $350 Million or Maybe More,” which is quite a remarkable feat.

Recently, Directi announced the formation of another company, Radix Registry, which has applied for 31 gTLD strings, including .bank, .loans, .insurance, .law, .shop, .music, and many others. It was also announced that “Directi has committed over $30 million” towards these new gTLDs, which is quite a big commitment.

I wanted to ask Bhavin some questions about Radix Registry and about the new gTLDs. I appreciate his willingness to answer. Feel free to ask your own follow up questions if you’d like.

ES: Most of the TLD strings you applied for will be contested. Do you think your company will partner with other companies on some, or would you prefer to spend more on auctions?

BT: At this time we are open to both possibilities. There is no doubt that for some of the hotly contested TLDs it will make more sense to partner, as opposed to running up the Auction value to excessive levels. That amount can be much better utilized if invested in post-delegation marketing. ICANN has said that it will encourage “voluntary agreement” between parties to resolve conflicting applications, and that auctions are only a method of “last resort”. We are also prepared for aggressive competition in cases where the partnership isn’t the best choice for us. The Directi group has more than adequate reserves to compete for all the strings we have applied for. We will evaluate the possibilities on a case by case basis and lean in the direction that makes most strategic sense.

ES: What is your company doing to prepare for the “digital archery” process?

BT: We have devoted some of our best resources to ensure that we are able to achieve the spots we’re looking for. I believe there is too much riding on this process since the third and fourth batch could see a lag-time of 2-4 years. Ideally ICANN should attempt to scale-up its evaluation resources and process all applications at the same time.

ES: How do you think new gTLDs will impact the domain investment space, including the aftermarket and monetization?

BT: Due to the massive increase in the supply of premium real-estate, we may see a short-term decline in domain name valuations. Since customers will have premium name options in a TLD which closely represents them, they will maybe less likely to pay large sums for a short .com name.

In the long-term there will only be a small number of nTLDs that will be interesting from an investment stand-point. We believe that overall the domain investment space will not be significantly impacted in the long term and will actually grow due to the additional options in the namespace.

ES: What are the key factors in getting consumers to adopt the new TLDs?

BT: I believe there are three stages to a successful newTLDs

1) Awareness: Customer should be able to ‘get it’ i.e. see clear value in registering their domain name in nTLDs. In some cases that value is obvious because the TLD itself has tremendous appeal. In other cases it is not. In those cases one needs to create awareness through marketing and garner customers’ interest.

2) Distribution: Registrars and channel partners will be spoilt for choice in the ngTLD era. For TLDs that do rely on Registrars, winning their favor and obtaining prime shelf-space will be key.

3) Adoption: No TLD is successful until it sees patterns of growing adoption from its user base. Record-breaking registration at launch is not an indication of adoption. Renewal rates, utilization of domain names for the primary website (not just a pointer to a .com) and the TLD becoming a destination for a variety of recognized web properties will ensure long-term growth, sustainability and hence success.

ES: What is your personal favorite gTLD application, and why do you think it will be commercially successful?

BT: Each of our TLDs have been chosen after a tremendous amount of research and analysis. I do not have a specific favored one and am equally excited about the potential of all of the strings

Keep This in Mind When Judging a Registry’s Success

I often hear and read critical and/or snide comments about various non-.com domain registries and how many are presumed to be failures. Some people seem to think that if a registry doesn’t have millions of domain names registered and/or if the aftermarket for a particular registry’s domain names is weak, that the registry is a failure.

One thing we all need to keep in mind is that a registry does not necessarily need millions of domain names to be a successful business, and a successful business should be all of our goals. They do not need to have a strong aftermarket or frequent large sales either. If a registry covers its expenses and makes any profit at all, by most business accounts, it should be considered a success (especially if the founder’s pay is part of the covered expenses).

Let’s think about the new gTLDs for a second.

Let’s say I operate the .xyz registry and sell 25,000 domain names a year at $20 a pop. That’s half a million dollars in annual revenue. Let’s do some back of the napkin math and say I paid my one-time $185,000 application fee and another $200,000 for annual operations expenses and commissions so I don’t have to worry about managing the registry. If I pay myself $200,000 for being fat, dumb, and happy, my registry would be profitable in its second year, after all costs are paid, assuming a strong renewal rate (likely if many are defensive registrations). Again, this is some sloppy math, but you can imagine how it would be profitable.

To the average Joe, 25k domain registrations sounds like a failing domain registry, especially if the aftermarket isn’t churning big sales. However, having a half a million dollar revenue stream with low overhead is a damn good business venture in my opinion. It might not be glitzy, and the general domain investor public may look down upon a small registry, but it can be lucrative, especially when you consider that many companies would happily buy strong revenue stream businesses at decent multiples.

That is one reason why there are so many gTLD applications, and it’s another reason domain investors need to look at the big picture to see that there are many ways to get rich in the domain industry. There are of course lots of risks and expenses, but we should all look at the big picture sometimes and see that there are many ways to make money in the domain industry.

Recent Posts

Have a Real Presence Online When Selling Domain Names

0
When it comes to selling domain names via outbound marketing, credibility is very important. If a prospective buyer receives an unsolicited and unexpected email...

2021 vs 2025 – % of .coms in my Portfolio

1
I don't closely track the percentage of domain extensions in my portfolio. I could have 75% .com or I could have 99% .com domain...

Nominations Open for 2026 ICA Awards

0
The Internet Commerce Association (ICA) is now accepting nominations for two domain investing community awards. Domain investors may now submit their nominations for the...

Bodis Gives Performance Update After Google Parked Domain Opt-Out

3
Bodis sent an update to customers yesterday about recent performance impacts related to pay per click parking revenue. The company attributed the decline to...

Glad This Sale Wasn’t an LTO

0
Sometimes, the most obvious use for a particular domain name is in a manner that would either be offensive, controversial, or negative. This will...