Home Search

ICANN Posts Video Interviews with New gTLD Applicants

2

Over the course of the past few weeks, ICANN has been posting interviews with new gTLD applicants, and I have found them interesting. Most of the interviews are fairly brief, but the applicants offer some insight into why they applied for certain gTLD extensions and their plans to use these extensions.

Some of the interview subjects include:

  • Frank Schilling of Uniregistry
  • Daniel Schindler of Donuts
  • Monica Kirchner of Dot Luxury
  • Aaron Grego of .rest
  • Jeff Sass of .club
  • Chris Jankowski of .GOP
  • Alex Stamos of Artemis
  • Antony van Couvering of TLDH
  • Daniel Negary of .xyz

I shared a number of the interviews below for your ease in watching them. I recommend that you visit ICANN’s You Tube page to see the full list of interviews. You may wish to subscribe to the ICANN video page so you can get updates when new video interviews are posted.

Here is an assortment of the videos:

Frank Schilling on gTLDs

22

Without a doubt, Frank Schilling owns one of the most lucrative private domain name portfolios (maybe the most lucrative). His company, Name Administration, annually sells millions of dollars worth of domain names, and it most likely generates into the 8 figures in PPC income per year.

Last year, Frank founded an acclaimed domain name parking company, Internet Traffic, and his Domain Name Sales platform that was opened to the public has received considerable praise from its users (myself included).

Recently, Frank announced the creation of Uniregistry, a company that has applied for a number of gTLD extensions. Clearly, Frank is bullish on the market for gTLDs.

Earlier today, I posted an  interview with Mike Mann, who has a differing opinion on gTLDs.  I reached out to Frank with the same questions I asked Mike, and I want to share some of his thoughts on gTLDs. My questions are bolded below.

Will companies adopt descriptive keyword gTLDs and re-brand websites?

Yes, slowly at first. Companies will use them as novel marketing tools in advertising, but then gradually the ship will turn and you’ll see then used more frequently as the anchor-domains for corporate sites – and as primary sites.

How long will it take consumers to understand what gTLDs are?

That’s a good question. Nobody knows for sure, but technology has people learning quicker now and there will be a ton of marketing from all corners once these are out. 5 years or so? Definitely less than 10 years.

What is the path to success for a gTLD operator?

The Uniregistry model: Low fixed price registrations, delightful ease of use and utility, hands-off (open, free, greenfield) governance, coupled with strong rule of law and abuse mitigation safeguards.

How do registrars and registries sell their names?

Registries will pay registrars to carry their products (as they do now) but Uniregistry plans to have a relationship with registrants for renewals, transfers and management via the Uniregistry website. We plan to encourage people to deal with their registrar but want our registrants to have a delightful ease of use and the ability to engage in name administration at the registry level if they wish. We plan significant marketing incentives for registrars to promote our strings. The TLD process will be very good for those capable of selling names.

Will brand gTLDs help make consumers aware of the right of the dot?

Absolutely. When consumers drive down the freeway and see billboards with justdoit.nike and drink.johnnywalker and drive.bmw it will change the way they feel about website addresses.

Will you be investing in registries and/or acquire various domain names in different TLD?

Uniregistry is the only registry aside from Verisign, Affilias and Neustar who have built their own registry software and infrastructure. We’ll be offering those services to other comers in round 2 and beyond. I do not plan to invest in any new tld based SLDs. There will be great opportunities to acquire strategic names in strings (used.cars, AnythingYouCanThinkOf.free) but I won’t be pursuing them. I would be participating there if I had time, but I’ve made the commitment to run registries so plan to focus all my energy there.

How can domain investors make money when it comes to gTLDs?

Focus on the Registries that are run as I described in the success model above and purchase strategic names at registration price, and then do as you would do with existing sld’s: monetize them and engage in development and resales.

Do you think marketing dollars spent on gTLDs will be good for the domain industry as a whole?

Absolutely. Anything that promotes domain names on such a grand scale, will help to educate the general public about their value.

Will land rush opportunities bring more people and capital into the domain investment space?

This is also an unbridled YES. There are going to be many more domainers in the future, from all walks of life, and from many more corners of the World.

What will happen to the money domain investors spend on gTLDs?

gTLDs? or SLDs? I think if you buy the right SLDs which rhyme with the types of names you see in modern marketing you will make money. If you buy the wrong names you will loose money.. The game is the same as it ever was only the position of the dot and the price of entry is changing.

My gTLD Predictions

45

I’ve been investing in domain names for almost ten years, and I don’t believe we’ve yet seen anything that is going to have as big of an impact on our business as gTLDs. Hundreds of millions of dollars will be spent on these new domain extensions, and we are going to see our industry change as a result.

I want to share several predictions for the new gTLDs from a domain investor’s perspective.

  • Although the US had more applicants than other regions, gTLDs will be more widely used and popular abroad than in the US. ccTLDs are very popular outside the US, and as a result, people are more apt to look to the right of the dot outside US borders.
  • Domain investors will not embrace gTLDs as much as applicants may be modeling, and there will be some TLD registry failures as a result of the projections being inaccurate.
  • Owners of the keyword string .com names are going to be very happy. Some registries will feel the need to buy the corresponding .com names and pay a lot of money for them. In addition, there will likely be a ton of error traffic that pays well.
  • There will be  anomalous  sales in most of the “good” keyword TLDs that are similar to the $450,000 sale of Meet.ME. The key factor to these sales will be relevance to the keyword. For instance, Insurance.Gay might not be a great domain name, but Dating.Gay would be valuable.
  • Within 5-10 years, companies like Affilias and Verisign will benefit from failed registries because they will be able to acquire the user base and recurring revenue streams from “failing” registries. They likely have the ability to manage these TLDs better, and as a result, they can make key acquisitions when the opportunities present themselves.
  • A domain registrar is going to patent technology to be able to suggest a TLD for when someone goes to register a domain name. For instance, when someone tries to register CurtainsAndDraperies.com, the registrar will suggest CurtainsAndDraperies.Shop along with premium registry held names like Curtains.Shop.
  • Popular registrars are going to make a lot of money with new TLDs. There will be massive competition amongst registries for “shelf space” on the search page, and that will lead to strong margins for registrars on newly registered domain names and premium domain names.
  • There will be many deals made before registries go to auction, and there will be very few auctions. I can see some companies making millions of dollars by dropping out of the running instead of gambling with an auction.
  • Although there were many, many brand applications, I don’t think we will see many brand .TLDs used in marketing for a long time. I believe many brands sought their TLDs for defensive measures instead of for marketing purposes.
  • Companies with domain industry ties, like Donuts, Radix, TLDH, STRAAT, and Uniregistry (among others), are going to do very well with their TLDs. They know the business of selling domain names, and they should be able to translate that experience into gTLD sales.
  • Companies are going to spend hundreds of millions of dollars marketing their new TLDs, and that will lead to more awareness of domain names and domain investing. It will also bring new money into the fold, and there will be a lot more inexperienced people who think they can get rich quickly by buying and re-selling domain names.
  • There will be lots of litigation.

Please share your predictions if you’d like.

Recent Posts

Entrepreneurship Handbook Offers Domain Advice – Reveals a $385k Domain Name Purchase

3
Chad Folkening shared an excellent newsletter article from the Entrepreneurship Handbook that will be of interest to domain investors. Not only does Dave Schools...

Referring a (Bad) Prospect to a Broker

3
There are many times when the valuation of a domain name my company owns is far greater than what a prospective buyer thinks it...

Somewhere.com Reportedly Acquired for $400,000

1
The Somewhere.com domain name has reportedly been acquired for $400,000 USD. The acquisition was announced on X this morning by Nick Huber: Big news: We spent...

Can You Beat my Time on Pyramid.com?

2
Michael Cyger launched a fun solitaire game called Pyramid solitaire on the exceptional Pyramid.com domain name. I've played it many times and find it...

My Experience with Afternic / Dan Checkout Link

1
I recently sold a domain name I owned for several years after an email discussion with the buyer. During our negotiation, at least three...