Did TON Foundation Acquire Ton.com?

While looking through my DomainTools Whois alert emails (Name Server Monitor and Registrant Monitor) this morning, I noticed the Ton.com domain name appears to have changed hands.

Ton.com has long been owned by Digimedia and registered at Tucows. The domain name transferred to the Cloudflare domain registrar, with much of the Whois record redacted. One of the few things that isn’t redacted is the registrant location of Zug, Switzerland. The Name Servers also use Cloudflare nameservers.

I shared my observation on X:

The domain name does not resolve to any website at the time of publication.

Some additional research shows the TON Foundation appears to be located in Zug, Switzerland. The organization uses Ton.org for its website. I also shared this observation on X:

The Ton.org domain name is registered at Namecheap, and while it has Cloudflare nameservers, they are not the same nameservers as those used by Ton.com. Put simply, I do not know if the TON Foundation or a related entity acquired the Ton.com domain name. There is some circumstantial evidence that leads me to believe this is a possibility, but the new registrant is not known.

Assuming Ton.com was sold, it’s almost certain the acquisition price will not be released per Digimedia policy, unless the new registrant opts to release the price. Whether that happens or not is anyone’s guess, but Ton.com is definitely worth a ton.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

3 COMMENTS

    • >If house sales are public records why not domain sales??

      If the buyer (or seller) is a public company, then they should be reported in line with the (local) requirements about disclosure.

      Beyond that it should be entirely down to the purchaser in my opinion.

      No different to you being the _only_ decider about wherther your bar-bill, or shopping purchases or club memberships are shared publicly – people should be entitled to privacy by default.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Bodis Gives Performance Update After Google Parked Domain Opt-Out

3
Bodis sent an update to customers yesterday about recent performance impacts related to pay per click parking revenue. The company attributed the decline to...

Glad This Sale Wasn’t an LTO

0
Sometimes, the most obvious use for a particular domain name is in a manner that would either be offensive, controversial, or negative. This will...

Com Laude to Acquire MarkMonitor

3
Com Laude has built its reputation as a leading domain name management service and registrar for large corporations. The company competes against several other...

How I Quickly Check My Afternic Landing Pages

1
Last week, I added a couple of domain names to my Afternic account. Both domain names were won in GoDaddy expiry auctions and registered...

TonyNames Hits $100k Milestone with .io Sale

4
I've followed TonyNames on X for several years. Who is TonyNames? Honestly, I don't really know, but he has shared more than most people...