Did TON Foundation Acquire Ton.com?

While looking through my DomainTools Whois alert emails (Name Server Monitor and Registrant Monitor) this morning, I noticed the Ton.com domain name appears to have changed hands.

Ton.com has long been owned by Digimedia and registered at Tucows. The domain name transferred to the Cloudflare domain registrar, with much of the Whois record redacted. One of the few things that isn’t redacted is the registrant location of Zug, Switzerland. The Name Servers also use Cloudflare nameservers.

I shared my observation on X:

The domain name does not resolve to any website at the time of publication.

Some additional research shows the TON Foundation appears to be located in Zug, Switzerland. The organization uses Ton.org for its website. I also shared this observation on X:

The Ton.org domain name is registered at Namecheap, and while it has Cloudflare nameservers, they are not the same nameservers as those used by Ton.com. Put simply, I do not know if the TON Foundation or a related entity acquired the Ton.com domain name. There is some circumstantial evidence that leads me to believe this is a possibility, but the new registrant is not known.

Assuming Ton.com was sold, it’s almost certain the acquisition price will not be released per Digimedia policy, unless the new registrant opts to release the price. Whether that happens or not is anyone’s guess, but Ton.com is definitely worth a ton.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

3 COMMENTS

    • >If house sales are public records why not domain sales??

      If the buyer (or seller) is a public company, then they should be reported in line with the (local) requirements about disclosure.

      Beyond that it should be entirely down to the purchaser in my opinion.

      No different to you being the _only_ decider about wherther your bar-bill, or shopping purchases or club memberships are shared publicly – people should be entitled to privacy by default.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

.Com Doesn’t Matter in Some Countries

5
If you've been fortunate to spend time traveling to other countries, you'll quickly learn that .com is less important to businesses in some countries....

Saw.com Announces $100 Million in Domain Name Deals

1
The Saw.com domain name sales brokerage and sales platform announced a milestone this morning. The company surpassed $100,000,000 in domain name deals. I presume...

That Company May Cease to Exist

1
I received a strong offer on one of my one word .com domain names last week. I declined, but in the process of doing...

Auction Platforms Shouldn’t Benefit from Default Bidders

13
If the winning bidder for a domain name auction does not pay and the auction platform offers the domain name to the next highest...

LTO is Betting on the Buyer and the Platform

2
When you agree to a lease-to-own (LTO) domain name deal, you’re making two bets: one on the buyer’s ability and willingness to complete the...