Legal News

Panelist Found RDNH Despite No Response from Registrant


While looking through my WIPO Domain Name Decisions email this morning, I saw something I do not recall seeing in a UDRP decision before. An Italian company called Advice Group S.P.A. filed a UDRP against the seemingly generic The domain registrant, who I believe is a domain investor, did not respond to the UDRP filing.

Wasteless Upgrades to via Terminated UDRP


I was looking at this morning, and I saw a UDRP filing I had not noticed before involving the domain name. From my perspective, or (depending on the proper case) is a pretty generic domain name. In addition, was created way back in 1996. In taking a very cursory look at the domain name and creation date, I do not believe this was going to be an easy UDRP for the complainant to win.

Family Dispute Leads to UDRP


When I was looking over the recent UDRP decision on, I was not surprised to see the claim denied on a 5 domain name UDRP filing, which included and I didn’t even take a glance at the decision because I just assumed the UDRP was filed by a company that wrongly thought it could get control of some seemingly generic domain names.

It was not until I saw this tweet from IP and domain industry attorney John Berryhill that I learned there was more to this UDRP than meets the eye. In fact, it appears to involve a family dispute:

BackCountry Trademark Aggression + Domain Names


Earlier this year, outdoor clothing retailer Backcountry reportedly started to become more aggressive with regards to its Backcountry trademarks. The company, which operates on its brand match descriptive domain name (, reportedly went after other companies and websites that were also using Backcountry in their branding. This made many people upset, especially when they learned that some of the companies in Backcountry’s crosshairs had been using the “Backcountry” branding for a long, long time: UDRP Decided Rapidly


Less than two weeks ago, I noticed that a UDRP had been filed against the domain name at the NAF. While Duggan stood out to me as a last name, what really caught my attention was a quick Whois search that showed that is owned by a person with Duggan as his last name. I think this fact should have made the complainant realize the UDRP will not succeed because it would seem impossible to prove the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith if the registrant’s last name is the same.

UDRP Filed Against (Update)

5 is now the subject of a UDRP proceeding at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The UDRP is WIPO Case D2019-2508. It looks like the UDRP was filed within the last few days.

Recent Posts

Local Tips for NamesCon Austin

People are going to begin arriving in Austin, Texas for NamesCon in a little over a week from now. Although Austin is quite popular,... Acquired via Sedo for $264,000

Another large sale will be added to the 2019 domain name sales reports at DNJournal and NameBio. was sold for $264,000 in December...

Domain Investing is Hard Work

I saw a thread on NamePros from someone who seems to have had enough with investing in domain names: I Give Up! I am...

BIN or Accept Offers and Leads?

As someone who manages a portfolio of my own domain names, the majority of which I consider to be inventory I would like to...

GoDaddy Logo Gets an Update

If you visited GoDaddy's website or its social media pages this morning, you probably noticed the company's new logo, icon, and color scheme. GoDaddy...