Sedo Provides Final Update on Autism.Rocks Discussion

Following the sale of Autism.Rocks, there was an issue between the seller of the domain name and Sedo. Shortly after the conclusion of the sale, Sedo commented on the situation, stating in part, “We are in direct contact with the seller and together we are going to analyze the process on potential mistakes and how to proceed.”  In addition, the company stated, “Again, we are in contact with the seller and hope to sort out the situation.”

I just received an updated statement from Sedo regarding the situation, which I have shared in its entirety:

On behalf of Sedo, I’d like to take the opportunity to provide an update regarding the recent Autism.rocks situation. We’re happy to report that we’ve been able to resolve the customer’s concerns regarding this transaction.

Respectfully, we will have no further comments on the topic at this time. As a strict internal policy, Sedo does not publicly disclose details of our business dealings involving our clients or business partners. This is in line with providing the best of service to our clients while respecting their privacy and confidentiality that Sedo holds at the utmost of importance.

Even though we will not be commenting on this matter any further, as always, we welcome your feedback and suggestions on how Sedo’s website and services can be improved to meet the varying needs of our customers and the domain community generally, especially those new to the domain aftermarket.  

Should you have anything further to discuss, please don’t hesitate to let me know.

I have not heard from the seller of the domain name to confirm that it is resolved to his satisfaction, but I presume the company wouldn’t issue this statement were it not the case. I am glad to hear this seems to be resolved amicably.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn
    • Non transparency in very much in line with domain industry practice.

      As for making good, it’s ONLY when a story becomes public do they do something about it, NOT because it’s the right thing to do but because they don’t want their image tarnished.

Leave a Reply

Recent Posts

Fox.org UDRP Decision is Upsetting

0
Last night, I saw that WIPO had posted an update regarding the Fox.org UDRP. Fox.org is a domain name registered in 1996, and I...

CEO of NFT.com Shares Domain Name Acquisition Learnings

0
Jordan Fried is the owner of some exceptional domain names. A few of the domain names he owns include NFT.com, PuertoRico.com, and Fried.com. This...

Taking a Blog Break

45
I have been writing articles on my blog since 2007. I have been fortunate to have the advertising support of many domain industry companies...

Some Thoughts About 2023

3
As the year winds down, I have been thinking about what to expect for the upcoming year. I am hopeful that it will be...

How I Am Preparing for the New Year

4
Less than a week remains in 2022. This is generally a quiet week in terms of domain name sales, so I tend to spend...