People occasionally email me to ask about the legitimacy of owning and using a domain name with an obvious trademark. I almost always tell these people “it depends” and refer them to a lawyer specializing in the field of intellectual property. Some cases are pretty cut and dry in favor of the trademark holder, and other cases may seem cut and dry but go in favor of the domain owner.

ESPN filed a UDRP against the domain name at the National Arbitration Forum, and the sports media conglomerate lost. The decision was published on the NAF website today.

According to the respondent in the contentions section of the UDRP decision, is used “in connection with sports news parody content.” I had a look at the website this morning, and as a regular visitor, I would not confuse these two websites or think has anything to do with ESPN’s SportsCenter programming. Aside from the fact that the domain name has the word “Not” in it, I think it is pretty clear that is a parody website. The UDRP panel appears to agree that the website is offering parody content and the domain owner has a right to do that. From the decision:

“Although Respondent was aware of the SPORTSCENTER mark and Complainant’s rights therein actual knowledge alone is not dispositive of Respondent’s bad faith. Moreover, Respondent does not attempt to disrupt Complainant’s business, as it offers parody material regarding sports, and does not purport to keep users from visiting Complainant’s website.”

One other aspect of interest was the panel’s consideration of the doctrine of latches in this case. I don’t think it really impacted the outcome of this UDRP decision, but according to the decision, “the Panel finds Respondent’s evidence of the delay in Complainant’s action regarding the disputed domain name to be material.” This could be helpful to a future UDRP respondent.

In addition to its website, has a considerable social media following. Its active Twitter account has nearly half a million followers.

It will be interesting to see if ESPN decides to pursue this case in court or if they will let the website operator continue. My guess is they will not pursue this further, but we shall see.

Interestingly, it looks like the domain owner represented himself in this UDRP filing.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Recent Posts UDRP Decision is Upsetting

Last night, I saw that WIPO had posted an update regarding the UDRP. is a domain name registered in 1996, and I...

CEO of Shares Domain Name Acquisition Learnings

Jordan Fried is the owner of some exceptional domain names. A few of the domain names he owns include,, and This...

Taking a Blog Break

I have been writing articles on my blog since 2007. I have been fortunate to have the advertising support of many domain industry companies...

Some Thoughts About 2023

As the year winds down, I have been thinking about what to expect for the upcoming year. I am hopeful that it will be...

How I Am Preparing for the New Year

Less than a week remains in 2022. This is generally a quiet week in terms of domain name sales, so I tend to spend...