V.TV Pending Delete: What Will it Sell for at Auction?

I am not sure the reason why, but it looks like the single letter V.TV domain name expired and is now in pending delete status. Assuming one of the major drop catching auction houses is able to grab it, the domain name will go to auction tomorrow or Tuesday.

A Whois history search at DomainTools shows me that V.TV had been owned by Future Media Architects. It is unclear why the domain name expired.

I looked at NameBio, and I was able to search for public single letter and single number .TV domain name sales it has recorded. The largest sale is $18,000 for D.TV. The only other single letter .TV sale was the $17,500 sale of E.TV. There were 5 single number .TV sales recorded, ranging from $3,100 to $5,555. Although the volume of reported sales is very low, it is interesting to see that single letter names sold for much more than single number names. Of note is that there hasn’t been a publicly reported single letter / number .tv sale since 2011, so the market has likely changed since then.

I am not entirely sure how .TV drop catching works, but at NameJet, V.TV already has 85 bids, with the high bid being $1,201. Backorders need to be placed in the next 6+ hours to be eligible for the auction if a NameJet partner registrar catches it. I looked the name up on DropCatch.com, and I don’t see it listed there.

What do you think V.TV will sell for, assuming it goes to auction? If I am incorrect about my .TV drop catching assumptions here, please let me know!

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

22 COMMENTS

  1. NameJet allows people to place bids on domains which NameJet isn’t even guaranteed to get.

    Getting this drop is going to require a little bit of luck and a lot of EPP connections to VeriSign. Technically, any VeriSign registrar has the chance but will most likely end up being registered by whomever has the most credentials.

  2. FMA has been dropping lots of non com/net/org domains in recent months. This might have had a premium renewal cost. Even princes need $$$ eventually. 😉

  3. I am sure Verisign will take it back, like they took G.tv back. But in case they don’t it should hit 50k+ on Namejet, market is soft right now, but single letter .tv non premium renewals are still gold if you hold out for right end user.

    I own P.tv, had it on Namejet reserve 100K, went to 80K in July, 2016 so it didn’t sale. So still holding for 100K+ on that.

  4. Does not makes sense why he would drop it???? I have talked to Elequa and other single letter .tv owners who have received offers for up to $250K+ who turned it down.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Do You Own Your FirstNameLastName.com?

10
Owning your first name last name .com domain name is a flex for some people. It can make it easier for people to find...

Moonshot BIN Pricing, but Invite a Negotiation

0
TonyNames shared another exceptional .ai domain name sale earlier today. Tony sold the 3 letter FRL.ai domain name for $30,000. In the post announcing...

The $5k Limit

8
I have been in a negotiation with a buyer, and it seems like we are close to an agreement on a domain name sale....

No Nameserver Change ≠ Fake Sale

1
A few years ago, I privately closed a very substantial domain name sale. Following the sale, the buyer did absolutely nothing with the domain...

GoDaddy to Launch “Premium Domain Marketplace” on DomainNames.com

6
The Afternic X account posted a link on X without much context that caught my attention this morning: 👀 https://t.co/JL8P45lRng 🔜 — Afternic (@afternic) October 3, 2025 https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js Visiting...