Fruit .com Domain Name Sale Prices | DomainInvesting.com
Neustar Domain Names

Fruit .com Domain Name Sale Prices

19

My company owns a fruit .com domain name that regularly receives inquiries and offers. It seems like most people who submit an offer or make a purchase inquiry don’t know a whole lot about the value of domain names. To help them understand how much similar domain names sell for, I send them a list of publicly reported comparable fruit .com domain name sales.

I thought I would share my findings publicly, like I did when I wrote about color .com domain name sales. I know of a few other privately reported sales, but when I am using the data to illustrate the value of one of my domain names, I would prefer to only share public sales recorded on NameBio. If you know of other fruit .com domain name sales, I invite you to share them in the comment section.

Publicly reported fruit .com domain name sales:

  • Kiwi.com – $800,000 – source
  • Strawberry.com – $160,000- source
  • Fruits.com – $160,000- source
  • Tangerine.com – $100,000- source
  • Raspberry.com – $27,500- source
  • Plums.com – $26,000- source
  • Cantaloupe.com – $25,000- source

It can be difficult to convince anyone the value of any type of domain name. There are many factors to setting an asking price and agreeing to a sale price. Sharing publicly reported comparable sales is one way to actually prove the value of a somewhat similar domain name.

Although these sale prices may not help pinpoint the exact value of the domain name my company owns, it will help show that a $100 or $1,000 offer for my domain name is far too low to even be considered serious. Sharing comparable sales like this is a good way to at least provide some understanding for why I have set the price at the level it was set without getting into a multi-email argument about domain name values.


About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has sold seven figures worth of domain names in the last five years. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest.


Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | | Facebook | Email

Comments (19)

    Tony

    Those prices are not a good indicator of value without qualifying that the 6-figure sales were to end users while the 5-figures were most likely wholesale, ie, to investors. Bottom line, be prepared to spend 6-figures minimum.

    August 9th, 2017 at 11:44 am

      Elliot Silver

      True, but it can help make someone realize that their $100 offer is absurd and not close to reality.

      In reply to Tony | August 9th, 2017 at 11:48 am

      John

      You are onto the truth, Tony. Good to see.

      In reply to Tony | August 9th, 2017 at 4:58 pm

      John

      That is certainly so, Elliot, but it happens that I have been thinking of this very topic lately. This is an area in which people have been making a big mistake in domain valuation, including yourself I’m sorry to say. Even King David was temporarily blinded by his own error, a story I’m sure you are quite familiar with, and even the famous luminaries in the domain industry can make this mistake. It’s all about the great and popular “real estate” analogy and how it gets used. More below…

      In reply to Elliot Silver | August 9th, 2017 at 5:01 pm

    steve

    Elliot, I’m not sure providing the comps of other fruit domains would be that relevant.

    I’d point out the big picture: the potential branding of a product or company such as Apple, Blackberry, Orange

    But you’re the expert. I’m an amateur in domaining.

    August 9th, 2017 at 11:51 am

      Elliot Silver

      I think doing both is important.

      For most brands, having an exact match domain name is important, but a brand can be built without the EMD.

      Showing actual sales of similar types of domain names can help a prospect understand that the price given wasn’t just pulled out of thin air.

      In reply to steve | August 9th, 2017 at 11:56 am

      John

      Great post, Steve. You too are onto the true and it’s great to see. You guys have certainly saved me a lot of trouble today.

      In reply to steve | August 9th, 2017 at 5:02 pm

    Dan Gustafson

    I’d love it if someone would go head to head with Apple using the Orange brand… lol

    August 9th, 2017 at 1:04 pm

      Gordon

      that makes no sense. It’s apples and oranges.

      In reply to Dan Gustafson | August 9th, 2017 at 1:38 pm

      John

      LOL

      In reply to Dan Gustafson | August 9th, 2017 at 5:03 pm

      John

      Double LOL

      In reply to Gordon | August 9th, 2017 at 5:03 pm

    John

    I’ll have more to say later. This has turned into a very important thread. Need to tend to other things right now…

    August 9th, 2017 at 5:05 pm

    John

    Before I get to that, however, think of Disney’s $4 billion purchase of LucasFilm a while ago. What does that have to do with anything here? You’ll find out…

    August 9th, 2017 at 5:07 pm

    Dn Ebook

    In a world of branding adding a color can also create interest

    August 9th, 2017 at 7:47 pm

    John

    Looks like I may be pretty tied up till tomorrow eve, but stay tuned to this small corner of cyberspace for more on this important topic that concerns us all. In the meantime, you would also do well to check out Konstantinos’s coverage of the latest from Rick S. over here: https://onlinedomain.com/2017/08/09/domain-name-news/rick-schwartzs-rules-domaining/

    August 9th, 2017 at 9:17 pm

    steve

    This post per fruit comps could provide a nice lesson in pricing, negotiating, branding and creating a vision, albeit only if you know for certain the potential buyer is NOT in the fruit industry. But even then, there are so many variables: the length of the domain, the popularity of the word/fruit, its name recognition across borders, even the sound.

    As someone wittily remarked above, you can’t compare oranges and apples. & you can’t compare blueberries and mangoes.

    I believe comps work in certain verticals: cloud, insurance, health, crypto (for these days), coin, but there’s more art than science in pricing a fruit domain (you need to present a narrative/vision/story)

    Or just contact Rick or Michael Mann and have them sell your fruit domain for 7 figures — these guys are brilliant negotiators. & of course you know this.

    I hope you get a bucket of bitcoins for your fruit domain, Elliot. Best luck 🙂

    August 10th, 2017 at 1:42 am

    Nicco Schaal

    End users who could and should own such domains as mentioned above, unfortunately, seem to get along just fine without. One reason might be that some prices are just too high. Moreover, the fact that there is 800+ extension to choose from does not help either. It certainly does not make the $800.000 .com Kiwi very tempting. Sellers of plums and cantaloupes may not know what they are missing; these prices are a giveaway.

    August 10th, 2017 at 4:58 am

    John

    Well I’m not still tied up now, but I’ve lost the spark of motivation I had yesterday. Plus there is certainly plenty else to tend to. Will save the wisdom for another day perhaps… You can certainly do well with the latest from Rick S. covered by Konstantinos though… 🙂

    August 10th, 2017 at 9:56 pm

    Patricia Kaehler

    I’ll see what I can find for you fruit related…

    What’s the link to the article / research you did on the keyword: color

    Have you done one (or can you do one) on the keyword: senior

    and — who is the person behind the commentor above with the screenname “john”

    ~Patricia

    August 16th, 2017 at 1:48 am

Leave a Reply

Name *

Mail *

Website