Subscribe

Sahar Shares Additional Thoughts About Alphabet

24

Yesterday morning, I shared an interesting Facebook post written by Sahar Sarid discussing the  decision to use ABC.xyz for Google’s  new Alphabet holding company  with some of his thoughts. This morning, Sahar shared additional insights and thoughts about Alphabet and the decision to choose ABC.xyz for the website.

Sahar gave me permission to share the entire post  that he published on Facebook today. I know that some people do not have Facebook accounts (or they use them for personal things rather than business discussions), so you are welcome to post your thoughts and comments here or or  directly on the Facebook post.

This is a follow-up post in a series of posts examining Google’s new Alphabet name, what it means, what it tells us, how they come across. Agree or disagree? comment below.

With Alphabet, While Google was driven by serious Anti Trust allegations in creating this new structure, from branding perspective, they tried to come across as unconventional, young, edgy, and experimental. I don’t think it works. I think people ultimately will see through it, and I think they whole branding aspect can be described in one word: Fail.

Let me explain.

Sahar Sarid Shares Thoughts on Google’s ABC.xyz

Sahar Sarid is one of the most successful domain investors I know. A member of the Domain Hall of Fame, Sahar is successful to the point that he spends much of his time traveling the world and enjoying life. He has sold millions of dollars worth of domain names, and he maintains a valuable (private) portfolio of domain name assets.

I saw that Sahar published some thoughts about Google’s decision to use ABC.xyz for its new Alphabet holding company branding, and he gave me permission to share his commentary here:

I had the whole night to think of Google’s move last night and here are my conclusions:

DeBlasio.Fail is Launched

1

I was checking out the NY Post this afternoon, when I scrolled to the bottom of the homepage and saw a creative use of a new gTLD domain name. As you can see below, the NY Post has a banner with a link to the website DeBlasio.Fail. Bill De Blasio is the sitting Mayor of New York City.

When you visit DeBlasio.Fail, you see a heading at the top of the website that says, “DE BLASIO COUNTDOWN CLOCK“, and there is a clock ticking down the time remaining in Mr. De Blasio’s current term as Mayor.

On the  DeBlasio.Fail website,

Bloomberg Files UDRP on Bloomberg.News

I was looking through the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) UDRP filings, and I saw that Bloomberg Finance, L.P. has filed a UDRP on the Bloomberg.News domain name. The UDRP is WIPO Case D2015-1378.

According to Whois information, the Bloomberg.News domain name is registered to someone with a Beijing address, and it was created on July 14, 2015. Interestingly, on the same day Bloomberg.News was registered, Bloomberg dealt with a fake Twitter corporate report that appeared on Bloomberg.Market, another gTLD domain name. Perhaps the registrant of Bloomberg.News was inspired by the Bloomberg.Market news.

I don’t think Bloomberg will

Stockbrokers.com or .Stockbrokers?

26

Peter Dengate Thrush posted the tweet below in reference to a Namepros interview with the owners of Stockbrokers.com. I presume because Stockbrokers.com was acquired for $185,000 and the application fee for the first round of new gTLD domain extensions was also $185,000, Peter mentioned the following:

I would have chosen Stockbrokers.com over .Stockbrokers for 4  reasons:

The Problem is Not Just The New gTLD Program…

16

Last month, a fake news report about Twitter appeared on a newly created website found on  Bloomberg.Market. The website, created on a new gTLD domain name, had a design that apparently looked like the genuine Bloomberg website. The resulting confusion briefly caused a jump in the price of Twitter stock.

Shortly after this made the  news, some people were quick to blame the new gTLD program. Yes, Bloomberg.Market was created using one of the new gTLD domain names, but no, I don’t think this is  endemic to new gTLD domain names. I think this  can be done on any domain name.

I just read  an article on Boston.com  about how