Remove BIN From Landing Page Before Outbound

I’ve been doing a bit of outbound marketing on some of my lower value inventory-quality domain names. I have been using DomainLeads.com as well as Google searches for lead generation and reaching out to prospective buyers to move some of this inventory.

One thing I’ve been trying to do is to remove BIN pricing from my landing pages before doing outbound. I haven’t been removing BIN prices from platforms like Sedo or Afternic, because I am more likely to forget to re-add it, but it would probably be wise if I did that, too.

If I keep the BIN pricing available when I do outbound, there’s a chance someone will visit the domain name after receiving the email and buy the domain name via the landing page. Instead of paying the low escrow fee at Escrow.com or the 5% commission for an imported deal via Dan.com, I’ll end up paying more than triple the commission, assuming a Dan.com or Afternic landing page.

Another potential complication is if I agree to sell a domain name to one person and someone else swoops in and purchases the domain name via the landing page before being able to pull it down. Not only would I pay more commission, but I would also anger the other prospect who thought a deal had been agreed to via email.

In June, I did some outbound on a 3 word .com priced at $1,997. A few days after sending the emails to several targeted prospects, one of those prospects bought it via GoDaddy. Instead of paying ~$100, I paid about ~$300 in commission.

For most of these types of deals, it’s not the end of the world if I pay more in commission fees, but I’d rather have the money than let a platform have it when I initiated the deal.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Consider Removing “WHOIS” from Domain Name Contracts

0
I use several different domain name purchase or sale agreements depending on the situation. Each of these agreements references "WHOIS" as a means of...

I Appreciate Having a Broker as a Counterparty

9
I appreciate being able to discuss the sale of a domain name with a domain broker representing a third party. Not only does this...

Gong.com UDRP Should be RDNH

1
The Gong Show was a television talent show on ABC in the late 1970s. Contestants would perform a variety of acts while being judged...

Top 5 Domain Names in 2025 Super Bowl Commercials

3
The Super Bowl was played last night, and a great deal of attention was on the Super Bowl commercials. In the recent past, domain...

Samba.com Now Forwarding to Samba.tv

3
Three weeks ago, Samba.com sold for $143,000 in a NameJet expiry auction. Samba.com is an exceptional domain name, and there are many branded companies...