QW.com UDRP Denied Due to “Fraudster”

A UDRP was filed at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) against the valuable 2 letter QW.com domain name. The complaint was a bit confusing, pitting the Complainant, Quickware, Inc. / Williams Fred, against Quickware, represented by Fred Williams, as the Respondent.

The sole panelist, Scott Blackmer, ruled in favor of the domain registrant in this UDRP. The decision was published on the WIPO website this morning. Based on my reading of the decision, it appears that someone impersonated the domain registrant in an attempt to wrest control over this high value domain name using the fairly inexpensive UDRP:

“As explained above, (a) the record indicates that the Complainant is a fraudster impersonating the Respondent, (b) there is no evidence in the record that Quickware Inc. actually continues to exist as a legal entity, and (c) the trademark cited by the Complainant is held by an entirely unrelated company in any event, Qujickware Engineering & Design LLC of Waltham, Massachusetts. There is no trademark on which to ground a UDRP complaint even if the Complainant were a proper party.

Thus, even if the Complaint were allowed despite the apparent fraudulent nature of the proceeding, the first element of the Complaint would not be established.”

Frankly, I am surprised we don’t see more of these types of cases. There is a fairly low bar required to file a UDRP, and the cost compared to the value of a great domain name is pretty low. Someone could submit publicly available information in the hopes of convincing a panelist it is their domain name, and if the UDRP is unanswered by the domain registrant, a panelist could easily rubber stamp the decision. Fortunately, Mr. Blackmer did not do this. I hope WIPO and NAF highlight this case to other UDRP panelists to be on the lookout for something like this in the future.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

1 COMMENT

  1. It’s not the first time this sort of thing has been attempted. I can recall off the top of my head two prior schemes – one using a forged trademark certificate, and another one using similar fake credentials – at WIPO, and two others involving impersonators/fakes at ADRForum.

    As the TRX.com dispute showed, there are UDRP panelists who don’t even bother to check the ownership of a claimed trademark registration, so the UDRP is ripe for this sort of thing.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

TRC.com Sets Auction Record at Sav.com

5
TRC.com expired at the end of November 2024. The domain name was apparently registered at a domain registrar that doesn't have a deal with...

Consider Removing “WHOIS” from Domain Name Contracts

0
I use several different domain name purchase or sale agreements depending on the situation. Each of these agreements references "WHOIS" as a means of...

I Appreciate Having a Broker as a Counterparty

10
I appreciate being able to discuss the sale of a domain name with a domain broker representing a third party. Not only does this...

Gong.com UDRP Should be RDNH

1
The Gong Show was a television talent show on ABC in the late 1970s. Contestants would perform a variety of acts while being judged...

Top 5 Domain Names in 2025 Super Bowl Commercials

3
The Super Bowl was played last night, and a great deal of attention was on the Super Bowl commercials. In the recent past, domain...