Home Blog Page 24

LTO is Betting on the Buyer and the Platform

2

When you agree to a lease-to-own (LTO) domain name deal, you’re making two bets: one on the buyer’s ability and willingness to complete the payments, and another on the platform’s ability to stay operational for the entire lease term. It’s easy to focus on the buyer, but the platform should also be considered, and that decision shouldn’t be made based solely on the transaction cost.

There are some platforms that have operations governed by a governmental authority. I believe Escrow.com, for example, has specific escrow requirements in the different states it operates. I think it also has California-specific escrow requirements it must meet to operate because the business is located there. Law firms and attorneys also have specific governmental requirements and oversights for managing escrow payments and transactions.

Andrew Rosener on Miss Understood Podcast

Andrew Rosener is one of the top domain brokers. I had to strike “one of” because I know as soon as I hit publish, I’ll get a WTF message from Andrew with a photo of his Escrow.com awards and ring. Joking aside, Andrew is a great domain name educator with a wealth of knowledge that is second to none.

This morning, Andrew posted a link to a video interview he did on the Miss Understood podcast with Rachel Uchitel. This is more of a high level interview with Andrew, but I have always found some nuggets of gold in these types of interviews.

Get Expiry Reports to Keep Sales Platforms Updated

4

For many years, I kept my portfolio at around 500 domain names. It was easy to manage those domain names on the sales platforms I used. During the past several years, I made a conscious effort to grow my portfolio, which gives me more consistent sales. The downside is that it is a bit more work to manage my 2,500-strong portfolio of domain names.

Because many of the inventory-quality domain names I buy are essentially lottery tickets, I have been letting more of these domain names expire. If I have owned a domain name for many years without any inquiries and the metrics don’t look nearly as good as when I bought it, there’s a good chance I will let it expire. Those domain names will be replaced by better domain names.

Confusion = Clicks = Confused

Since the beginning of domain name monetization, domain investors have touted the value of type-in traffic. People type-in a domain name either expecting to find something related to the keyword they typed or to find a company with that brand name. Oftentimes, they would click the links on the landing page, and that would generate pay-per-click (PPC) revenue for the owner of the domain name. Cha-ching. Many homes, cars, and luxuries were purchased courtesy of PPC income.

For many of these visitors, there was some level of confusion involved in their typing and clicking. They either didn’t know what website they needed or they were on the wrong domain name looking for something else. Had they known specifically what they needed or where they intended to visit, they may have used a search engine or typed in the correct domain name.

Following $50k Sale, Surge.xyz Live

1


Swetha Yenugula recently reported the $50,000 sale of Surge.xyz. In her post about the sale, Swetha shared a screenshot of the Escrow.com closing statement, likely because of the flack she has received regarding previous .XYZ domain name sales. Swetha also mentioned the transaction was brokered by Domain Agents, a platform that represents buyers who want to acquire domain names anonymously.

Video: Why Nick Huber Paid $400k for Somewhere.com

0

Nearly a year and a half ago, I wrote about the $400,000 acquisition of Somewhere.com, which was one of the largest one word .com domain name sales last year. Somewhere.com was acquired by Nick Huber, and the domain name was used to brand Support Shepherd.

In a LinkedIn video posted yesterday, Nick Huber discussed why he bought the domain name. In the video, Nick remarked that he has gotten more value from the domain name than he paid for it. Notably, while the sale was reported at $400,000, the host referenced a $450,000 acquisition price and the acquisition cost is noted as “over $400,000.” I asked Nick why there is a discrepancy on the purchase price, and I will update the sale references if necessary.