Is Houzz Going After (Updated)

A UDRP was filed against the domain name at the National Arbitration Forum (NAF). The UDRP case # is  1739475, and it can be tracked via

Because the UDRP was filed at NAF, the name of the complainant is not known at this time and will not be made public until the UDRP is decided. My guess is that the UDRP may have been filed by Houzz, the home improvement and home fashions website. According to the Houzz LinkedIn profile page, the company was founded in 2009. Again, this is just a guess since there are a few other possibilities (including HOUZ International B.V., Drink Houz, Houz AS, ART HOUZ, and quite a few other entities that use “Houz” in their branding). was created back in 2003. The oldest historical Whois entry at DomainTools I can see is from 2007, and it is owned by a Las Vegas-based entity with the last name Doumanian. The current registrant has the same last name as the registrant from 2007, so I would not be surprised if the domain name has been owned by the same or a related entity since then. It is also quite possible that the domain name was owned by this same entity since 2003 because I can’t see any records from prior to 2007.

Right now, is parked with pay per click advertising links at Sedo. The domain name is also listed for sale at Sedo and has a $50,000 minimum offer requirement. According to the listing page, there have been 8 bids made to try and buy this domain name since it was listed on Sedo.

If the domain name is owned by the same entity since 2007 or prior, it would not have been possible for the registrant to register it in bad faith if Houzz is the complainant since Houzz was founded after this domain name was already registered. With RBF seemingly out of the question thanks to the ICA, I don’t see how the complainant would prevail if it is Houzz. Importantly, I don’t know if Houzz is the complainant, nor do I know for certain that the same registrant has owned the domain name for many years. These important details will be revealed when the decision is rendered and published.

Update: It was Houzz that filed the UDRP. The decision was just published, and the complaint was denied. The domain owner will retain the domain name. A finding of RDNH was not made by the panelist. The domain owner represented himself in this UDRP response.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn


  1. Well, it doesn’t help that on, there are additional search links shown for… I thought this was going against the number one rule for parking of valuable names that might possibly get hit with a UDRP? Don’t show links that might bolster the Complainant’s case.

Leave a Reply

Recent Posts Profitably Resold for 8 Figures

In March of this year, I reported on the sale of The domain name was acquired by HubSpot Co-Founder Dharmesh Shah for more...

First Look at my 2023 Domain Industry PMC Jersey

This August, I will be riding in my 10th Pan-Mass Challenge ride to raise funds for Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. I will be riding...

Just Add “The”

I went to the post office the other day to buy stamps. I had a brief conversation with the person working at the counter,...

Uni-Parked Domains Now “may be for sale”

When GoDaddy announced the Afternic to Uni transition, I was notified I would need to change any Uni-related nameservers I use. I was curious...

2023 Pan-Mass Challenge

On August 5-6, I will embark on my tenth Pan-Mass Challenge ride to raise funds for Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Dana-Farber is one of the...