, Owned by Facebook, Subject of UDRP (Updated)

It looks like someone has filed a UDRP against, a domain name that is owned by Facebook. The UDRP was filed at the National Arbitration Forum (NAF), and it is case #1923613. I spotted the UDRP filing on this afternoon, and I did a search of the NAF website to confirm that this is the domain name listed in the UDRP filing. currently forwards to a download page within Facebook’s website where visitors can download a service called Facebook Gameroom. According to historical Whois records at DomainTools, Facebook has been the registrant of since approximately October of 2016. In fact, when Facebook acquired, Jamie Zoch wrote an article about the acquisition on DotWeekly.

Unfortunately, the NAF does not reveal the identity of the complainant before a decision is reached, so it is unclear who filed the UDRP against When I searched Google for Gameroom today, the top results were for Facebook’s Gameroom service.

In my opinion, notwithstanding the fact that Facebook owns and uses, it seems like is a descriptive domain name, and I don’t see how a complainant could win. The fact that Facebook owns the domain name and is using it for its Gameroom service makes it even less likely for this domain name to be lost via UDRP. I am looking forward to reading the decision to understand why this UDRP was filed.

Update: The UDRP was denied, but the panel did not find that this was a case of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn


  1. Nice find Eliot..
    Lots of exact or other filings that incorporate GAMEROOM on the USPTO. None look to be from “FacePlant”.
    Giving the negative publicity of FB and Tweaker, including antitrust, and likely a significant – if not half their subscribers leaving in the next few years due to politics – why not file a claim on the generic / intuitive term. Point being is once FB goes live with whatever its makes into – it will likely take on secondary meaning after the fact – leaving other previous uses in the dust – or buried with astronomical legal fees
    So hit FB now while you can ?

Leave a Reply

Recent Posts Announces 2023 Master of Domains

During the NamesCon conference today, announced its Master of Domains winners. The annual award celebrates "the highest grossing domain name brokers for deals...

How to Buy a Domain Name That is Owned by Someone

For a domain investor, buying a domain name is second nature. Investors hand register domain names, purchase domain names via expiry and private auctions,...

My 2023 Domain Industry PMC Jersey

For a number of years, I have created a domain industry Pan-Mass Challenge jersey to raise funds for Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Many domain industry... Profitably Resold for 8 Figures

In March of this year, I reported on the sale of The domain name was acquired by HubSpot Co-Founder Dharmesh Shah for more...

First Look at my 2023 Domain Industry PMC Jersey

This August, I will be riding in my 10th Pan-Mass Challenge ride to raise funds for Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. I will be riding...