Change / Test BIN Pricing Regularly

From the outset, I will tell you that I don’t have statistically significant data that would offer true insights about price testing and/or price sensitivity. I think regularly changing and testing your prices could prove helpful in selling domain names.

I have many hundreds of inventory-quality domain names that have historically been priced at just shy of $1,000 – either $999, $997, $988, or something else very close. I recently updated the prices of just about every name I own that had a price of $2,000 or less to ~$2,500. I did this on Dan.com and Afternic. My rationale was from insights shared by Darpan Munjal and Michael Sumner.

In the weeks since I made that change, I did not have a BIN sale at that price point. I did have 2 sales for just shy of $2,000 from buyers who reached out directly to negotiate. With such a small data set, I can’t say what impact the price changes had on those deals.

About a week ago, I stared the task of reverting many of the prices back to ~$1,000. As much as it’s a buzzkill to get a Dan.com or Afternic email for a small sale, it’s an even bigger buzzkill to not get any sale emails. Since changing the prices back, I’ve closed two BIN sales for $997 – one on Dan and the other on Afternic.

I have no real way of knowing whether if buyers were eyeing these domain names and monitoring prices. I can’t say whether they would have paid $2,500 or not had I kept the prices the same. That’s one downside of maintaining a fairly small portfolio of fewer than 2,000 domain names. Sometimes I am flying blind.

I am going to try to find a way to make it easier to changes prices en masse. I plan to reach out to Dan.com and Afternic to get a list of my inventory priced below $2,000 and see if I can make automated submissions to regularly update the prices via spreadsheet. Perhaps someone who passed on a name at $997 will feel badly about not buying it when the price goes up, but will grab it quickly when the price reverts. The only way to know for sure is to keep testing.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

4 COMMENTS

    • I do not have enough data to give any advice on that. My sales could be random and have nothing to do with price changes. I wanted to share what I experienced though.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Failed Transfers Aren’t Automatically Refunded

9
I keep most of my domain names registered at GoDaddy because I find it is easier to manage a portfolio at one registrar. Throughout...

Updated: Escrow.com No Longer Supporting Payments To/From China and Israel

5
Update: After publishing this article, I heard from Freelancer.com CEO Matt Barrie (Freelancer is the parent company of Escrow.com). Matt told me the information...

Atom.com Shares Non .com Sales Distribution

3
I have spent more money on non-.com domain names this year than ever before. My perspective is that startups are using them as less...

MAD Comment from NTIA About “Wholesalers”

4
Andrew Allemann wrote about the US National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) statement about the .com registry extension agreed upon with Verisign. As a...

Beware When Using AI for Domain Name Descriptions

6
Artificial Intelligence can be a time saver. For domain investors, it can make it easier and quicker to create marketing copy to help promote...