Bird.com Sold for $2.5m; Fish.com for $1.6m at ROTD Auction (Updated)

Bird.com has been sold for $2.5 million at today’s Right of the Dot live domain name auction. Fish.com was the next domain name up for auction, and that domain name was sold for $1.6 million. Based on the location information shown on the bidding page, the winning bidder appears to be the same for both of these auctions.

Bird.com and Fish.com have long been owned by TABcom LLC. Bird.com does not resolve to an active website at the moment, but Fish.com has a fully developed business operating on it.

Once the payments for these domain names have been made and the domain name transfers are completed, I am sure ROTD will report the sales to DNJournal and NameBio for archiving. These will undoubtedly be two of the largest domain name sales of 2021. From my recollection, they are two of the largest live auction domain name sales in many years.

Update: According to an article in Domain Name Wire on May 11, 2021, a lawsuit has been filed by ROTD and the seller of Bird.com and Fish.com.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

9 COMMENTS

  1. I wonder how much domains would sell for if there was no UDRP threat. I think anyone who intends to spend a tidy sum on a domain should probably conduct an international trademark search first – especially in light of the panelists having decided an ownership transfer “resets the clock.”

  2. John –
    You nailed it.
    #1)
    For me I keep all my domains at a registrar where I live and where I conduct business – insuring any civil case occurs on my turf.

    #2)
    And for the domains you keep control over after a stupid frivolous claims – that is where a polished broker is needed if you intent to sell the domain.

    #3)
    In these domain sales – no doubt they did their Due Dilly – and decided would probably lose a UDRP, may have to pay civil penalties under ACPA and most of all – they just really wanted the domain for now or future uses.

    Its all about the system creating work for the panel and the brokers – i.e. living the American Dream – and there is nothing wrong with that.
    Bri

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Poll: Are You Going to ICANN 79?

2
The ICANN 79 Community Forum Meeting is coming up in a couple of weeks. The meeting will be held in Puerto Rico from March...

Domain Broker’s Ad Campaign Highlighted by X Business with a Repost from Elon Musk

0
When looking at domain investor Twitter, I've noticed a few promoted/advertising tweets mentioning Rob Schutz and/or Snagged.com. I recently wrote about Rob and his...

NameJet Announces Platform Enhancements

3
Last Summer, NameJet made some "big changes" to its platform. In essence, NameJet appears to have become a clone of Snapnames, its sister auction...

Rationale Behind CoFounders.com Acquisition

1
It's not often that we hear from the founders of a company to discuss why they spent what they did to acquire a specific...

.Bet Domain Name Acquired for 5 Figures, Reportedly Resold for $600k

9
According to a tweet from Identity Digital (formerly Donuts), the Bet.bet domain name reportedly sold for $600,000. I have not verified or researched the...