Report: Amazon to Shut Quidsi (, ...etc) |
101 Domain

Report: Amazon to Shut Quidsi (, …etc)


According to a news report  just published in the Financial Times  (FT), Amazon is shutting down Quidsi and its website brands. As you may recall, Quidsi operates websites on fantastic exact match .com domain names such as,,,,, and others. Amazon acquired Quidsi several years ago.

Here’s a brief excerpt from the FT article:

Amazon said on Wednesday that it was shutting down Quidsi, the company behind and that it acquired for $545m less than seven years ago, after failing to make the websites profitable.”

I don’t see any information about how Amazon will utilize these domain names once the brands are shut down. It looks like the company previously shut down Vine Market, which operated on, as that domain name now forwards to Perhaps Amazon will do something similar and simply forward these domain names to the relevant sections on its own website.

Using DomainIQ, I did a quick search to see some of the most valuable domain names owned by Quidsi, and here’s what I found:


This could have some reverberations within the domain name resale market. People  may speculate that if Amazon couldn’t make a business profitable on a bang-on exact match domain names, others might face the same troubles. Aside from that, there are now fewer success stories for people to share when discussing the value of exact match keyword .com domain names. I regularly referred to to show the branding potential for an exact match .com domain name.

It remains to be seen how these domain names will be used going forward.

About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has sold seven figures worth of domain names in the last five years. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest.

Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | | Facebook | Email

Comments (8)

    R P

    Two good product domains (diapers, soap), but neither can easily be manufactured and both depend upon selling other companys’ product. Nor do the products have real margin.

    As far as the others, simply brandable domains that cannot be easily monetized unless a large company buys and brands a new product line, or a startup forks over big bucks which is not common. Except for which could be intuitively used in housing industry although not English word.

    Just my 2 cents

    March 29th, 2017 at 3:37 pm


      Amazon knows they didn’t just buy a company, they bought a competitor with valuable real estate that could be a major competitor so Amazon could do absolutely nothing with these domains or redirect them and consider it a WIN.

      Bad weather always looks worse through a window!

      In reply to R P | April 1st, 2017 at 2:55 pm

    M. Menius

    Selling soap or diapers online probably not a strong enough business model. Very basic commodities. Compare those to, which probably has better margins and serves a much broader market of varied electronics.

    March 29th, 2017 at 3:40 pm


      How much better do you think the margins would be? Wouldn’t people just search eBay and choose the lowest price from for whatever brand (or no name) battery that they want?

      In reply to M. Menius | March 30th, 2017 at 3:52 am

    Logan saw a similar fate at two different shoe companies.

    March 29th, 2017 at 4:35 pm


    Hard to beat diaper pricing of Walmart and Costco. It would have to be a subscription model to work probably and cater to those that can’t go out shopping or that can afford not to. is easy to build out and profit from. Company just ran it wrong.

    March 29th, 2017 at 5:26 pm


      Amazon dominates the diaper market and I am sure they probably do well over double what Costco & Walmart do combined. And it’s not because they own, it’s because they offer 20% off a diaper subscription on

      In reply to WQ | April 1st, 2017 at 2:49 pm


    Well, they prob did the sub model for but meant it needs to be ran by a company that doesn’t have highly paid employees. Good for a small time biz, I would think.

    March 29th, 2017 at 5:28 pm

Leave a Reply

Name *

Mail *