IVI.com Subject of UDRP Filing (Update)

IVI.com

Another valuable three letter .com domain name is the subject of a UDRP proceeding at the World Intellectual Property Organization. A UDRP was filed against IVI.com, and it is WIPO Case D2017-2240.

The owner of IVI.com is WebMD, a publisher of health news and information. IVI.com was created over 25 years ago, in June of 1992. When I visited IVI.com this morning, the domain name did not resolve for me. It looks like WebMD and/or a related entity has owned the IVI.com domain name since the 1990s.

The company that filed the complaint is listed as Equipo IVI SL. A Google search for that entity showed me a website with the homepage title, IVI-RMA is the largest Assisted Reproduction group in the world. That company operates on the inferior IVI-Fertility.com domain name, and that company’s Legal Notices page showed the corporate name of Equipo IVI SL. It looks like the company also has the inferior ccTLD, IVI.es. It is understandable that the company would want to have IVI.com.

I am sure it must be frustrating to operate on a lower quality domain name when the exact match .com domain name isn’t being used any longer in a visible manner. However, I don’t understand why the complainant thinks it can prove all three aspects of the UDRP, which is a requirement to win. From what I can see, it will be very tough to prove that the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. That being said, a UDRP decision can sometimes go in favor of the complainant (see IMI.com UDRP decision ).

Unlike the IMI.com UDRP proceeding where the domain owner did not respond, I would be shocked if WebMD and/or its parent company didn’t respond. WebMD has been around for a long time, and the company certainly knows its domain names are valuable assets. Having the domain name registered at MarkMonitor should also be helpful to them, as it would be unlikely that the UDRP notice would be overlooked.

As with all UDRP filings against valuable domain names (especially LLL.com domain names), I will be monitoring this one.

Update: The complaint was denied and the domain registrant will keep the domain name. Interestingly perhaps, WebMD did not respond to the UDRP.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

2 COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Entrepreneurship Handbook Offers Domain Advice – Reveals a $385k Domain Name Purchase

2
Chad Folkening shared an excellent newsletter article from the Entrepreneurship Handbook that will be of interest to domain investors. Not only does Dave Schools...

Referring a (Bad) Prospect to a Broker

3
There are many times when the valuation of a domain name my company owns is far greater than what a prospective buyer thinks it...

Somewhere.com Reportedly Acquired for $400,000

1
The Somewhere.com domain name has reportedly been acquired for $400,000 USD. The acquisition was announced on X this morning by Nick Huber: Big news: We spent...

Can You Beat my Time on Pyramid.com?

2
Michael Cyger launched a fun solitaire game called Pyramid solitaire on the exceptional Pyramid.com domain name. I've played it many times and find it...

My Experience with Afternic / Dan Checkout Link

1
I recently sold a domain name I owned for several years after an email discussion with the buyer. During our negotiation, at least three...