ESPN Loses NotSportsCenter.com UDRP

People occasionally email me to ask about the legitimacy of owning and using a domain name with an obvious trademark. I almost always tell these people “it depends” and refer them to a lawyer specializing in the field of intellectual property. Some cases are pretty cut and dry in favor of the trademark holder, and other cases may seem cut and dry but go in favor of the domain owner.

ESPN filed a UDRP against the NotSportsCenter.com domain name at the National Arbitration Forum, and the sports media conglomerate lost. The decision was published on the NAF website today.

According to the respondent in the contentions section of the UDRP decision, NotSportscenter.com is used “in connection with sports news parody content.” I had a look at the website this morning, and as a regular ESPN.com visitor, I would not confuse these two websites or think NotSportscenter.com has anything to do with ESPN’s SportsCenter programming. Aside from the fact that the domain name has the word “Not” in it, I think it is pretty clear that NotSportsCenter.com is a parody website. The UDRP panel appears to agree that the website is offering parody content and the domain owner has a right to do that. From the decision:

“Although Respondent was aware of the SPORTSCENTER mark and Complainant’s rights therein actual knowledge alone is not dispositive of Respondent’s bad faith. Moreover, Respondent does not attempt to disrupt Complainant’s business, as it offers parody material regarding sports, and does not purport to keep users from visiting Complainant’s website.”

One other aspect of interest was the panel’s consideration of the doctrine of latches in this case. I don’t think it really impacted the outcome of this UDRP decision, but according to the decision, “the Panel finds Respondent’s evidence of the delay in Complainant’s action regarding the disputed domain name to be material.” This could be helpful to a future UDRP respondent.

In addition to its website, NotSportsCenter.com has a considerable social media following. Its active Twitter account has nearly half a million followers.

It will be interesting to see if ESPN decides to pursue this case in court or if they will let the website operator continue. My guess is they will not pursue this further, but we shall see.

Interestingly, it looks like the domain owner represented himself in this UDRP filing.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Do You Own Your FirstNameLastName.com?

10
Owning your first name last name .com domain name is a flex for some people. It can make it easier for people to find...

Moonshot BIN Pricing, but Invite a Negotiation

0
TonyNames shared another exceptional .ai domain name sale earlier today. Tony sold the 3 letter FRL.ai domain name for $30,000. In the post announcing...

The $5k Limit

8
I have been in a negotiation with a buyer, and it seems like we are close to an agreement on a domain name sale....

No Nameserver Change ≠ Fake Sale

1
A few years ago, I privately closed a very substantial domain name sale. Following the sale, the buyer did absolutely nothing with the domain...

GoDaddy to Launch “Premium Domain Marketplace” on DomainNames.com

6
The Afternic X account posted a link on X without much context that caught my attention this morning: 👀 https://t.co/JL8P45lRng 🔜 — Afternic (@afternic) October 3, 2025 https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js Visiting...