Correcting an Out of Context Article

As I do every morning, I received a Google news alert today with the topic of domain names. The title of the article is “Expert says very few domains are worth millions,” and it was posted on, “UK’s most progressive and innovative web hosting and web-based application providers for SME business today.”

Ordinarily I don’t post links to articles I believe are written poorly, but this one happened to include my opinion as the source, and the conclusion they drew was taken from a completely unrelated article. I don’t know if the article was written as SEO bait, but it got me to read it, and unfortunately, it caused me to write this post.

The article tried to juxtapose my article about the problems impacting domain auctions with the Media Post article, How Much Are Domain Names For Campaigns Worth?, in which Laurie Sullivan wrote, “Marketing and advertising agencies looking to strengthen campaigns might pay just about any price for a solid domain name if it means building a better relationship with consumers.”

The Global Globe article referenced me by writing:

Laurie Sullivan told Media Post that the most commercially attractive web addresses can sell for millions, meaning they can be prized business assets.

However, internet entrepreneur Elliot J Silver says multi-million pound transactions are the exception to the rule, as domains generally have a much lower value.

Although I do think that million dollar domain names are a very small percentage of overall domain registrations, I don’t think that this has anything to do with domain auctions, as the article further implies (“Writing in his blog, he reported that domain auctions have suffered lately due to firms being unrealistic as to the value of their addresses.”). The article was confusing to read, and it didn’t really make sense to jump to its conclusion based on an unrelated post of mine.

My opinion on valuable domain names can be found in Website Magazine’s Web Trends for 2010 article, in which I was asked for some predictions for the new year. In that article, I said  “High-value keyword names like and, which sold this past year, will continue to command high prices. Companies will continue to invest in their own businesses and will acquire high-value keyword domains names for growth and for competitive reasons.”

This puts my opinion more in line with Sullivan’s Media Post article than the Global Gold article insinuates.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn


Leave a Reply

Recent Posts UDRP Decision is Upsetting

Last night, I saw that WIPO had posted an update regarding the UDRP. is a domain name registered in 1996, and I...

CEO of Shares Domain Name Acquisition Learnings

Jordan Fried is the owner of some exceptional domain names. A few of the domain names he owns include,, and This...

Taking a Blog Break

I have been writing articles on my blog since 2007. I have been fortunate to have the advertising support of many domain industry companies...

Some Thoughts About 2023

As the year winds down, I have been thinking about what to expect for the upcoming year. I am hopeful that it will be...

How I Am Preparing for the New Year

Less than a week remains in 2022. This is generally a quiet week in terms of domain name sales, so I tend to spend...