Squeeze Upgrades to Squeeze.com

SqueezeYesterday morning, I noticed a Whois registrant change for the valuable Squeeze.com domain name. Because the domain name had been owned by Future Media Architects, I reached out to Uniregistry’s Vice President of Sales Jeff Gabriel, as Uniregistry typically acts as the domain broker on behalf of FMA. Unfortunately, Jeff could not provide details about the sale, but I believe Uniregistry was the broker.

When I visited Squeeze.com yesterday and clicked on the “Learn more” link, I was taken to a page within the SqueezeApp.com website. The company refers to itself simply as Squeeze throughout its website, so the acquisition of Squeeze.com represents a huge domain name upgrade. According to its Twitter profile, Squeeze is a FinTech app, and the website says it will be launching this Summer.

I reached out to Elias Janetis, CEO of Squeeze, to ask him about the acquisition. Although he couldn’t tell me the exact purchase price of the domain name, he did tell me that hepaid between 100K-200K” to acquire the domain name. I probed further to ask why he was willing to pay six figures for the domain name, and he was kind enough to share his rationale with me:

“We have the trademark for the word Squeeze in several markets. We are building a web experience for our customers that will be interactive via both web, and a native app. I believed a clean domain name would be beneficial for our customers that are searching for us, as well as other people searching that term. As we expand our direct to consumer marketing efforts this year, we feel that a clean url will yield benefits for name recognition/remembrance, as well as branding purposes.”

According to its Crunchbase profile, Squeeze raised $650,000 in debt financing a little over a year ago. I am not sure if they have raised  any other funds since then.

There have been comments on forums and various articles citing that apps are eliminating the need for domain names. I think spending 6 figures for a great domain name like Squeeze.com is more evidence that this isn’t the case. Unfortunately, because the exact price of the domain name was not shared, this sale will not be reported publicly.

This deal looks like a win/win for both parties.

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

5 COMMENTS

  1. Nice to see someone be a smart business person and buy the name vs threatening legal action or file a udrp first.
    You should try to find more of stories.
    It’s what normal business people (should) do.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

How Much Overlap on AI Domain Name Creation?

1
I sold a two word .com domain name for $4,999 via Afternic last night. The domain name consists of a noun and a verb,...

Atom Pay Offers $10 Transaction Fee Through 2025

0
Atom.com introduced one of the better Black Friday deals I've seen offered. The platform is allowing customers to transact with its Atom Pay service...

GoDaddy’s Paul Nicks Retires

3
Paul Nicks is a longtime GoDaddy employee of 18+ years, has announced his retirement from the company. Paul previously served as President of the...

Outbound Sales? Look for a Trade Organization

1
I don't think successful outbound domain name sales is easy. In fact, it can be pretty demoralizing depending on the response to your outbound...

Redeem That GoDaddy Monthly Auction Credit

1
GoDaddy recently announced a new benefit to its Domain Pro program. Domain Pro members receive a monthly $20 auction credit that can be used...