Atom.com Featured Sales Include LTO Deals

Over the last several weeks, I have been adding more domain names to my account at Atom.com. I have just shy of 250 domain names listed for sale along with some that are pending review. With another lease to own sale started last night, I currently have 4 LTO deals in progress at Atom. Two are .com, one is .AI, and one is .xyz.

Atom.com shares quite a bit of sales data from platform sellers. Towards the bottom of the customer dashboard page, there’s a section called Featured Sales. These domain names were sold on the platform, and Atom requests that customers keep the sales data private. Some of these sales are reported to NameBio with the permission of the seller and some are kept private.

One thing to note is that these deals aren’t necessarily completed deals. In fact, one of my recent deals is a $36,000 36 month LTO sale. Despite it being an LTO that was started less than a month ago, the domain name I sold appears in the Featured Sales list as if the sale was completed. Because I don’t allow Atom to report my sales publicly, I don’t know if it would be shared with NameBio while the LTO is ongoing, but others who do allow their sales to be reported can have a look for themselves.

Personally, I don’t think LTO deals should be reported as sales – even in private like this. That’s not my call though. Perhaps Atom should mark LTO deals with an asterisk or something else to indicate the domain name hasn’t been paid in full.

In the meantime – or if that never happens – customers who view these Featured Sales should understand some of them are not completed deals and not make business decisions based on this data.

I posted a poll on X to see what others think about this:

Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver
About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has closed eight figures in deals. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest. Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

7 COMMENTS

    • Thanks.

      There are multiple reasons.

      I don’t think it is wise for customers to be basing their own purchases or sale prices on deals that aren’t yet completed. If someone sees I sold (redacted).xyz and (redacted).ai for mid 5 figures each, they shouldn’t see that as a market indicator when the buyers only made one payment of 36. I don’t think people realize these Featured Sales aren’t all completed deals. I didn’t until I saw mine.

      In addition, I have found that things that should be changed tend to get changed more quickly when they are written about and discussed within the industry. If others think these sale listings are fine as is, then maybe I am in the minority and that’s fine, too.

      In short, this post uncovers something people may have not realized, and it is now a discussion/poll about whether or not it should be changed.

  1. Thanks for sharing this, Elliot. I think you make a very valid point regarding how Lease to Own (LTO) deals are presented. Reporting LTO agreements as completed sales—especially without clear labeling—can definitely be misleading, whether the data is shared publicly or kept within the platform.

    From a transparency and industry standards perspective, marking LTOs with an asterisk or clear notation would be a small but meaningful change. It helps other users interpret the data accurately and prevents inflated assumptions about market activity or pricing trends.

    That said, it’s great to hear Atom is showing solid traction for your names and that the platform is generating deals. Hopefully, they consider this kind of feedback—it would ultimately benefit the whole domain investing community.

    • So far so good, and I continue to build my portfolio there.

      I have had 8 deals in total, including those 4 LTO sales. I had one additional LTO deal that fell through after a couple of payments.

  2. LTO sales on Atom are not reported to NameBio as part of our integration until they are completed. I agree, they shouldn’t be reported on the dashboard even though it is more private.

    • Thanks for the clarification.

      I don’t mind if they’re shown on the dashboard, but I think there should be something that identifies ongoing LTO deals so they don’t appear with deals that fully closed.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

When Whois Contacts Fail, I Use GoDaddy DBS

4
One of the things I enjoy most about domain investing is the negotiations. Most don't work out, but I enjoy the thought and effort...

Experimenting with Spaceship SellerHub

6
I've been impressed by the growth of Spaceship and its recently launched SellerHub. The sister company to Namecheap has shown a great willingness to...

Afternic Allows Early LTO Payoff / Payout

2
A few years back, I glanced at my phone and saw more than ten consecutive emails from Dan.com. For a moment I was baffled...

WSJ Reports on $1.5 BILLION PE Acquisition of Namecheap

9
Richard Kirkendall is one of the hardest working executives in the domain name space as the Founder and CEO of Namecheap. He has built...

Domain Summit Asia 2025 Coming in November

1
Fresh off a successful Domain Summit conference in London earlier this month, conference organizers announced a new event coming to Hong Kong later on...